it is priceless to see the back of the hubris filled irish, another failure at a world cup. lol
England was a failure.
Ireland losing to a team who was, overall, better on the day and thoroughly deserved it after winning all their own pool matches? Not a failure.
---
Regarding the comments on the squad in general, I worked it out that there was an unbalance of Leinster players within the squad. It breaks down roughly (and I say roughly as the replacements may have muddled me) to the squad being made up of -
Connacht - 2
Munster - 5
Ulster - 7
Leinster - 16
Toulon - 1 (counting O'Connell as Toulon)
the 3 replacements called up, (Boss, McCarthy and Ruddock) are also Leinster players.
Also worth a mention there were some players who got very little game time at all. I can understand Furlong, as he's only 22 and relatively inexperienced only getting off the bench during one match given how strong the front row was, but Ryan, Zebo, Murphy, Strauss, Cave and Jackson all played at most 3 matches, often coming off the bench. One would even question why Furlong, Cave and Jackson were selected for the squad, as Cave only started against Romania, and Jackson's only match time was when he came on as a sub for Payne against Romania. Similarly, Furlong's only match time was after a substitution with 17 minutes left. I'm not a Jackson fan, but I do question the selection if we had players that coaches didn't even seem to think would add value on the bench across all of Ireland's matches. Definitely something for Ireland to look at when it comes to developing the depth of their squad - whilst they have definitely improved, it's not by enough. I do question why some players were there if the plan was to give them as little match time as possible, and why there seems to be more Leinster players than from other provinces - is Leinster higher quality? Do the other provinces need to work more on their development sides? Or is it just a possible bias? (but I shouldn't complain, I'm an Ulster supporter)
Anyway, this is veering slightly off topic.
Nothing is a failure about losing to a better team who played a better game, and weren't afraid to exploit the weaknesses.
Ireland lacked strong leadership on the field, due to losing POC, Sexton etc. I'm not sure some of the choices were right, I would have definitely tried Henderson at no. 6, but we didn't play well and the game was disappointing to those who really did have hopes for this team. But in losing, we have also been shown exactly what we need to work on which is as much the depth of the squad and having players of equal quality as it is our failings to really attack and adapt our game.
I was one of the ones who was hoping for an Ireland victory, and a tight game, but in the end my team did not play well when it counted. And the other team ran circles around them. Now it's all calmed down post match, I think it became clear 20 minutes in we had too many gaps we couldn't fill and Argentina ran straight through them.