Not really. If you're going to pick them for your match squad, play them. If they're good enough to be in one, they're good enough to be in the other.
Yea DDA had one good moment in the previous test where he spinned out of a tackle to make a nice pass that led to a try. But that first try that Mike Brown scored was also down to De Allendes poor defending, so if anything we will only gain something by replacing DDA with Esterhuizen.
Watch this video, at 50 seconds you will see DDA attempting to tackle Mike Brown from roughly 7 meters away from the try line. But he just has this weak attempt and Brown scores. How does a Springbok level 12 have such bad tackling skills?
Why is Jones dumb? What does Wilson bring over a second row who can also play backrow in Isiekwe? Brainless stuff.
A friend bought a bunch of tickets for this game, sorted accommodation and then told us (after it was bought) that he bought tickets and we needed to come. So in kind of a last minute thing I will drive the five and a half hour drive to Bloemfontein tomorrow, to go and watch this game.
Now the Springboks really have to win ! will be really **** to drive all that way and we lose! I mean there is nothing else to do in Bloemfontein.
Hope our centre combinations gets swapped with Kriel and Esterhuizen, they will run the English off their feet at Bloem, and then PSDT should start as he and Etzebeth are our best locks despite a great debut by RG Snyman.
As usual with Eddie Jones, it's tough to find any logical consistency between what he ways and what he does. If he believed in "back 5" players, then why did he sub a lock for a blindside so early on last week?
Just as valid a question to me is what does Wilson bring over Simmonds? More physicality I guess, but I'd happily sacrifice this for Simmonds' gas and ability to cover seven if called upon.
Ability to play at lock. Wilson's also a decent, if not outstanding, jackaller.
I didn't know that he could, in that case, fair point. I was assuming that if necessary, Shields would go there again. Is Wilson taller than he's listed as? Most places list him as 6'3".
On that same point what does hughes bring over simmonds off the bench? He's a carrier but not half as destructive as billy. Can only cover one position and arguable not fit enough yet. Simmonds and wilson could play 8. Would they do so much worse than hughes? We lose curry and we lose the pace in the back row and nor hughes or wilson will have that in the back row. For me long term simmonds holds that 20 shirt.Ability to play at lock. Wilson's also a decent, if not outstanding, jackaller.
You know what. In the longer term if we really powered up our front 5, and let them get on with all the grunty stuff I'd be very happy to try Curry and Simmonds either side of a big no8. Or even Curry and Curry. Not quite Hooper and Pocock, but a similar principle. We seem to have backs that can run, so why wouldn't we want our flankers more attuned to that style?On that same point what does hughes bring over simmonds off the bench? He's a carrier but not half as destructive as billy. Can only cover one position and arguable not fit enough yet. Simmonds and wilson could play 8. Would they do so much worse than hughes? We lose curry and we lose the pace in the back row and nor hughes or wilson will have that in the back row. For me long term simmonds holds that 20 shirt.
Spose he was never going to be dropped during the captaincy years regardless, but that's still astonishing.Apparently the first time Robshaw has been dropped since 2012.
Why is Jones happy to pick players who are contracted to super rugby but not players in the top 14?