England 2023/24

[Reiser99]

Chessum, Martin and Itoje suggest one is playing at 6.

 

[Rugbyfan564]

 

[mkersyshull]

It will be interesting to see if the plan for Mitchell's recovery is now changed as Borthwick now gets the final say

 

[Rugbyfan564]

It will be interesting to see if the plan for Mitchell's recovery is now changed as Borthwick now gets the final say

And where the tensions could become apparent.

 

[Wasps92]

3 fly halves, 1 scrum half and no tight heads. Bizarre.

 

[mkersyshull]

3 fly halves, 1 scrum half and no tight heads. Bizarre.

Which tight heads are currently be in position to be offered one.
And I don't think there's a clear second choice scrum half yet so who would you give it to?

 

[Rugbyfan564]

 

[TRF_Olyy]

Chessum, Martin and Itoje suggest one is playing at 6.

With no Willis in the squad I'm predicting CCS gets at least one start at 8 this international period
Wouldn't be surprised if Borthwick is eyeing up a Chessum/Earl/CCS first choice backrow for the 6N

 

[Vieux Talonneur]

In the press articles I've read the contract lengths are quoted as varying between 1 and 3 years and there's no mention of any intention to hand out more, instead just saying that SB's concentrating on his 'core' players.

Begs all kind of questions.

As for Dan, he's lucky but George is running out of steam and rightly or wrongly SB has clearly identified him as the successor. So the logic's fine if not the judgement.

 

[Noonz]

I thought it was supposed to be 25 central contracts? If so, 8 more to give out as players make a claim.

 

[Rugbyfan564]

In the press articles I've read the contract lengths are quoted as varying between 1 and 3 years and there's no mention of any intention to hand out more, instead just saying that SB's concentrating on his 'core' players.

Begs all kind of questions.

As for Dan, he's lucky but George is running out of steam and rightly or wrongly SB has clearly identified him as the successor. So the logic's fine if not the judgement.

Apparently some more might be given out post six Nations.

I suspect we will see a good few of those who missed out leave England in the coming years.

 

[Rugbyfan564]

 

[Which Tyler]

Worth remembering that we've been told repeatedly that players won't have their feet held to the fire to sign these contracts.
Some will want the security of signing, others would rather take the gamble that they'll play more than 6(?) times anyear, and get paid more in match fees.

Wouldn't be surprised if 25 were offered, and 8 declined.

 

[Rugbyfan564]

Worth remembering that we've been told repeatedly that players won't have their feet held to the fire to sign these contracts.
Some will want the security of signing, others would rather take the gamble that they'll play more than 6(?) times anyear, and get paid more in match fees.

Wouldn't be surprised if 25 were offered, and 8 declined.

Surely more would have declined if it means decent chance of a pay cut. And why none of the big names have declined?

 

[Rugbyfan564]

I get the feeling the press are not happy with the set up. Quite a lot of negative framing about who has missed out etc.

 

[Rugbyfan564]

The Guardian say Borthwick just didn't want to give out more. Wonder if the RFU cost cutting is involved.

 

[Which Tyler]

Given that contracts are cheaper than PAYG - that's unlikely

 

[Rugbyfan564]

Given that contracts are cheaper than PAYG - that's unlikely

But it does mean no unneeded rotations of those 17 to avoid paying effectively twice.

Also match fees always feel like a bit of an issue with big training squads involving lots of training work and being away from home and then not getting paid as much due to not making the 23

Plus I do wonder how any players will feel if they do feel they have got less money because in the end they would got more on match fees. Might where come 2028 they is a demand for top up on top of these p.