And where the tensions could become apparent.It will be interesting to see if the plan for Mitchell's recovery is now changed as Borthwick now gets the final say
Which tight heads are currently be in position to be offered one.3 fly halves, 1 scrum half and no tight heads. Bizarre.
With no Willis in the squad I'm predicting CCS gets at least one start at 8 this international periodChessum, Martin and Itoje suggest one is playing at 6.
Apparently some more might be given out post six Nations.In the press articles I've read the contract lengths are quoted as varying between 1 and 3 years and there's no mention of any intention to hand out more, instead just saying that SB's concentrating on his 'core' players.
Begs all kind of questions.
As for Dan, he's lucky but George is running out of steam and rightly or wrongly SB has clearly identified him as the successor. So the logic's fine if not the judgement.
Surely more would have declined if it means decent chance of a pay cut. And why none of the big names have declined?Worth remembering that we've been told repeatedly that players won't have their feet held to the fire to sign these contracts.
Some will want the security of signing, others would rather take the gamble that they'll play more than 6(?) times anyear, and get paid more in match fees.
Wouldn't be surprised if 25 were offered, and 8 declined.
But it does mean no unneeded rotations of those 17 to avoid paying effectively twice.Given that contracts are cheaper than PAYG - that's unlikely