- Joined
- Jul 28, 2012
- Messages
- 3,802
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
i thought morgan parra was to comeback ? i thought he was suspended for the scotland match only
i thought morgan parra was to comeback ? i thought he was suspended for the scotland match only
How?
Fickou at 12 is interesting as French midfield now looks very interesting
I think you are looking for threats that are not there....they have to get the ball and then get it to the centres before any perceived threat materialises!
Fickou at 12 is interesting as French midfield now looks very interesting
hmmm.....*interesting*...
And Tony's right, you remind me of those paranoid individuals when you're out camping and they try to make anything into a spooky moment "what was that ??....did you hear that ?? You definitely heard that, right ????"
It doesn't matter much that Fickou looked good a given day in red and black, he's playing in Bleus Saturday and that's all that does matter my friend.
France may play with heart, they might not as much as expected. They say they'll give it their all, but we'll see...
We've seen very lackluster teams with a good gameplan win more games than they lost, and then teams with fantastic talent but terrible coaching have dreadful seasons.
It took 6 months, not even, for Schmidt to make Ireland into a team that makes England at home look ecstatic from beating them - or pound Wales so hard on every cylinder the entire Rugby world thought for sure Gatland ball was obsolete and asked 'where does Wales go from here ?'.
PSA and co. have had 3 years, and we've looked progressively worse, like a decaying rotten shhit in the toilet someone forgot to flush.
PSA has made France so bad, fans are actually feeling nostalgic of the Marc Lièvremont days and talking about the old times when we were good, as if it'd been that long.
And with all that, France have enough quality that the players might have good games individually to make it collectively enough for their score to be higher than Ireland's 80min later...
It's a long shot, and Ireland are clear favorites in this one, but it's actually not impossible.
It's funny because as a Frenchman I'm not sure what I want:
- If we win, it's cool; Ireland are really good and we'd have actually won 4 of 5, which is very funny if not hilarious. But then England wins the 6N.
- If we lose, Ireland wins the tournament, and though it will be painful to go through all those Irish fans swarming and smelling their own farts for weeks, months and reading "BOD" in every single thread this forum has to offer...I'm actually cool with Ireland winning a tournament despite all that. It's Ireland, it's cool if they win plus it's really well deserved.
I think Ireland are the best team in Europe right now. Closely followed by England.
P.S.: congrats cmac. I like google.translate too. Fantastic tool...
While I agree with a lot my point is Fickou could be great for France just hasn't been given the game time. Also is his selection a slight show that PSA knows he's f'd up and is trying to go back to drawing board?
As you say the quality is there it's the game plan and direction that is lacking.
P.S.: congrats cmac. I like google.translate too. Fantastic tool...
no Parra-FTD
This i don't understand, i can make allowances for pretty much everything but these guys are possibly the best two halfbacks in europe when paired... Parra if i was selecting a NH team would be the first man on my team sheet, i rate him that highly. FTD can mix a game up really well, better than anyother French fly half and h'es powerful and breaks the gain line from 10, which keeps a back row narrow and creates pace out wide... it's just wrong he's not featured under PSA.
Ireland deserves to win it, there's no contest about it... But if it was all about deserving a win, ABs would have beaten France in 1999 RWC semifinal...
I am shared because I prefer to see an entertaining match than a french victory... I mean, if Frenchmen play the way they did over Scotts, I prefer Ireland to win it.
But if Frenchmen are able to lift themselves to the level of the momentum, of the match etc... Why not then ?
What I find reconforting is that we have played the tournament with the second string team, that youngs, universitarians and women did a great tournament... despite a so much foreigners in french top 14... the youngs should win it...
A french defeat wouldn't be a problem, it wouldn't mean the end of Saint André... neither an irish defeat would mean a bad thing...
I just remark that Ffrenchmen haven't done their usual incredible match yet... and of it was for next match ?
Ireland deserves to win it, there's no contest about it... But if it was all about deserving a win, ABs would have beaten France in 1999 RWC semifinal...
I am shared because I prefer to see an entertaining match than a french victory... I mean, if Frenchmen play the way they did over Scotts, I prefer Ireland to win it.
But if Frenchmen are able to lift themselves to the level of the momentum, of the match etc... Why not then ?
What I find reconforting is that we have played the tournament with the second string team, that youngs, universitarians and women did a great tournament... despite a so much foreigners in french top 14... the youngs should win it...
A french defeat wouldn't be a problem, it wouldn't mean the end of Saint André... neither an irish defeat would mean a bad thing...
I just remark that Ffrenchmen haven't done their usual incredible match yet... and of it was for next match ?