admartian
First XV
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Messages
- 1,749
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I'm with don on this too.
When naming any Canterbury-based side, you almost have to list the brothers first. Then Richie, then Dan etc.
Not surprising to me in the least.
When naming any Canterbury-based side, you almost have to list the brothers first. Then Richie, then Dan etc.
Adam Whitelock is pretty good. He is an undersized flanker but at the same time, none of the Whitelock boys are very big or fast, they're tall but that's about it. Only reason Sam Whitelock is a regular for the All Blacks is he is tall enough to ignore these problems. Locks are not reknowned for being particularly strong, fast, play makers or skillful players.
Funny you mention that considering the whole "quota" and racist debacle years back.They're slightly below average Super Rugby players to me. Apart from Sam as for the above reasonings. George is obviously the weak link in what could be the most dangerous loose trio in club rugby, with McCaw and Read. Crusaders need Nasi Manu to play 6 for them.
But then again, how many Islanders actually play for the Crusaders lately?
Edit : Sorry for double post.
Not surprising to me in the least.