- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 12,094
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Men are from Mars etc.
It would just be a logistical nightmare to implement such a thing.As an aside, does anyone know why you always see police officers in pairs of the same gender? It seems like that would be counter productive if they wanted to comfort, search, whatever, someone of a different gender- maybe they just go round with their friends?
Barritt for me, I guess...
Manu is lucky. Any assault on a police officer is thought to be a serious offence. The fact as he pled at MC and was sentenced there to a fine would suggest it wasn't too serious for the judges as usually they would have been committed to Crown.
People are saying that allowing people who have been indisciplined out of camp into camp without punishment will create further indiscipline. But that never hurt Wales' performance with Philips. Or Savea with New Zealand. Or probably no end of other sporting environments. England's 2011 WC isn't a like-for-like comparison, as they were all in camp problems, and Tuilagi's done this out of camp.
It would be foolish to say there's no link between indiscipline and poor performance, but it doesn't automatically follow. Which is what I'm solely getting at here. Strong management can and will establish a break between disruptive behaviour outside the environment and performance within.
So I'm not seeing any benefit to the England rugby team's performance here and now. In return we give up one of our best players at a supposedly critical juncture. That strikes me as a very poor trade. We have basically sacrificed one of our best players for the Moral and PR good of the England rugby as a whole, insofar as I can see, and that might be a good thing but it's an entirely separate argument from the one I'm pursuing. In any case, Tommi has a point that not every nation would do this - we are being different. And maybe that's good, and maybe that's not, but either way that definitely seems to be the way it is.
It was assault by beating.
Which means didn't cause injury.
As BBC article says he prob pushed them both.
The article I read (planetrugby) said he punched them in the stomach, though a push to the stomach is considered the same as a punch but depends on the force.
Assault by beating means there was some point of physical assault and violence.
Personally I trust the BBC reporter over Planet rugby.
Assult by beating means physical assault (usually push upwards) without causing injury. Causing injury moves it up to ABH.
We have people up in court who caused assault by beating were physical violence is committed. ABH is a more serious form
Yes but assault by beating also covers pushing look it up.
Assault is a vague term and assault by beating is also a vague term.
ABH is causing injury or harm.