- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,020,375
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
[[Filler until I get time to add all the fixtures ]]
Haven't seen it mentioned but Nathan Hughes red & ban has been overturned.
But Hughes can legitimately be trying to get back in order to force North to either ground the ball or get tackled by him in the dead ball area? That's allowed. Until North is actually tackled, Hughes is doing nothing wrong running that line for me. But that is exactly what they are saying. And if North hadn't been twisted by the tackle of Lozowski, Hughes wouldn't have made any contact running that line anyway.
http://i19.servimg.com/u/f19/18/92/60/15/hughes10.jpg
Hughes cannot be sure that North is going to dive or be successfully tackled by Loz until it's already too late, he slows as soon as North is successfully tackled, what more was he supposed to do, apart from not be running back to cover North whatsoever?
Burgess had a decent game all said as did Devoto. Burgess does need to work on his ball protection but he had completed some fantastic work at the breakdown.
Good to hearGlos are absolutely imploding
Goode's miss from right in front as evidence, took a similar flight path to a boomerang!but that wind seems crazy.