- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6,989
Shouldn't have allowed him to take it again, I usually like biggar but that was dumb as ****, also just kicking a ball into a guy as a retaliatory measure runs into foul play territory.
Out of interest, why was it not play on after the Biggar incident?
Out of interest, why was it not play on after the Biggar incident?
Right? The French player was retreating, Biggar chose to take the kick. If it isn't foul play against Biggar, for me it's just play on.Shouldn't have allowed him to take it again, I usually like biggar but that was dumb as ****, also just kicking a ball into a guy as a retaliatory measure runs into foul play territory.
I guess the guy technically was offside(? impeded play either way) so the ref said take it again rather than penalise because there was literally nothing he could do about it bar spontaneously combustOut of interest, why was it not play on after the Biggar incident?
But surely he's not offside if he's retreating and attempting to stay out the way, which he wasI guess the guy did technically was offside(?) so the ref said take it again rather than penalise because there was literally nothing he could do about it bar spontaneously combust
He's not offside cause you can't be offside on a free kick/penalty kick, the actually offense is not retreating back 10.But surely he's not offside if he's retreating and attempting to stay out the way, which he was