- Joined
- Jun 24, 2023
- Messages
- 1,433
I dont understand what you have to gain by lying, I reposted my original comment lol..
In tour shoes I'd just apologies and move on...
In tour shoes I'd just apologies and move on...
Well it's not like there were any centres offering that option. Or forwards tbh.From an England POV it's been good to see Steward used more. He has potential to be a pretty good crash ball option in the back line imo.
in an ideal world a still want a fb with more pace, if Steward does continue though need a winger with some genuine pace, Freemans no slouch and has and excellent power/pace combination, other wing could do with out and out pace though just to add some back 3 balance.From an England POV it's been good to see Steward used more. He has potential to be a pretty good crash ball option in the back line imo.
If only we had a player in the squad who has been tearing it up in the premiership, making line breaks and has explosive speed...in an ideal world a still want a fb with more pace, if Steward does continue though need a winger with some genuine pace, Freemans no slouch and has and excellent power/pace combination, other wing could do with out and out pace though just to add some back 3 balance.
If only we had a player in the squad who has been tearing it up in the premiership, making line breaks and has explosive speed...
Was referring to Feyi-WabosoYes, but Earl's already at no8.
in an ideal world a still want a fb with more pace, if Steward does continue though need a winger with some genuine pace, Freemans no slouch and has and excellent power/pace combination, other wing could do with out and out pace though just to add some back 3 balance.
Can we cite Ireland? Pace clearly very useful though, and perhaps more achievable for EnglandTBH our whole back line outside Mitchell's fairly pedestrian. Possibly a bit harsh but none are really electric - as Freeman's shown there's more to being a good winger than just speed but you need some proper gas in a back division.
(And please don't cite the AB slaying Youngs, Farrell, Brown, Barrett, Tuilagi, Ashton and Goode as a counter argument ).
Can we cite Ireland?
Wasn't the pen given for collapsing?I watched the highlights back, and really do question the penalty try and feel the maul we had collapsed against Italy was a lot more dangerous and potentially try scoring than this one.
For starters, we had 2/3 players with hands on the ball so they'd been a very high probability that if the maul had carried on, it would have been held up.
At least it didn't effect the result I suppose
I agree with it being a pen, no idea why Roots brought it down. Just questioning if it equates to a pen try. Earls and Itoje were on the ball so I can't see how it stopped a highly probable try.Wasn't the pen given for collapsing?
Well team out out so far, throw M Smith, OL in and suddenly it doesn't look slow, Daly for an out and out gas man and for my money you have a pretty good balance of power, pace and ball playing.TBH our whole back line outside Mitchell's fairly pedestrian. Possibly a bit harsh but none are really electric - as Freeman's shown there's more to being a good winger than just speed but you need some proper gas in a back division.
(And please don't cite the AB slaying Youngs, Farrell, Brown, Barrett, Tuilagi, Ashton and Goode as a counter argument ).
Not you, Geordie, you relentlessly positive ****The games are dull enough without the usual ******** posters tbh.
Ioan actually is this, and he trains very, very hard (which I think has possibly played a role in his selection in the first place) so I would also continue to select him now he's got that spot. Wales' main issues did not really stem from either half back IMO. The forward platform in every area was somewhere between both halves of the Scotland match which will be costly when playing against a side like England at Twickenham.hope he's a fast learner.
Thanks ill take that as a positiveNot you, Geordie, you relentlessly positive ****
Yeah, I agree. I feel it harsh to overly criticise Lloyd not just because that was his first start or because he's an inexperienced 10 but most importantly, as you rightly point out, the platform he's given is ****. There's no front foot ball and ball is generally slow which isn't ideal. Imagine if Lloyd was playing for Ireland or France. I'm not saying he'd be looking like the second coming of Barry John but he'd look better imo.Ioan actually is this, and he trains very, very hard (which I think has possibly played a role in his selection in the first place) so I would also continue to select him now he's got that spot. Wales' main issues did not really stem from either half back IMO. The forward platform in every area was somewhere between both halves of the Scotland match which will be costly when playing against a side like England at Twickenham.
With that said I'd have brought in Callum Sheedy ages ago and I bet as soon as he plays a few games for Cardiff people/media will be calling for his inclusion. A big ball carrier (or three, throughout) and tight play lump is also going to be required if the energy or speed of that last match is to be repeated to give front foot ball and reinforce the set piece.
Oh come on, the only reason Gareth Davies and his inferior kicking game was selected V England was because he had to hold Llpyds hand...Yeah, I agree. I feel it harsh to overly criticise Lloyd not just because that was his first start or because he's an inexperienced 10 but most importantly, as you rightly point out, the platform he's given is ****. There's no front foot ball and ball is generally slow which isn't ideal. Imagine if Lloyd was playing for Ireland or France. I'm not saying he'd be looking like the second coming of Barry John but he'd look better imo.