NotTooAmused
Academy Player
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 58
- Club or Nation
struggled so long to replace the Tuilagi
I reckon England would still be picking prime Tuilagi, he's just not a player you ever replace.
struggled so long to replace the Tuilagi
True, but prime Tuilagi was only something like 2011 to early 2013. Been largely broken ever since apart from the 2019 WC anomalyI reckon England would still be picking prime Tuilagi, he's just not a player you ever replace.
Probably, yes - which isn't really the problem.I reckon England would still be picking prime Tuilagi, he's just not a player you ever replace.
No issues with Tuilagi in his prime. He was a real asset. The issues came from the many occasions when he was not available / in poor form and we just picked another player to try to fill the role Tuilagi did, likewise with Vunipola. No issue building a plan around them when they were in their prime but when they were on the hospital bed more than the pitch, we needed to adapt beyond trying to get another player to do their role.I reckon England would still be picking prime Tuilagi, he's just not a player you ever replace.
You are not telling me that it was a freak of genetics that in the 90s and noughties we had good scrummaging props like Leonard, Rowntree, Vickery and White, and then suddenly by a genetic twist we have mobile props like Bevan Rodd and Kyle Sinckler. Its down to coaching and selection. Why did Will Collier not get selected for England? It was selection policy not genetics. In the 90s he would have got picked.I agree with this in general but how much of mobile props vs heavy duty scrummaging units is a coaching thing and how much of it is genetics, of course pounds can be gained and different types of Gym work done but bases and ceilings can only be influenced so much, or is it more that dynamic mobile props were given more attention and opportunity so the classic scrummaging ones dropped off the radar?