Great to see a couple of upsets on the first day! Only got to watch the NZ game, but will hopefully get to watch a few more games in the the next round. New Zealand weren't overly impressive, but did enough to win easily. Considering the perfect conditions they made far too many basic handling errors (nerves or maybe lack of combinations?). The other major issue was the lack of support for the ball runner, with players getting penalized numerous times for not releasing.
Yep, well done Ireland though I will point out that the Boks didn't have 3 starting SupeRugby players in the tight 5 as someone said. They had 1 starting SupeRugby player and 2 players who have had a few minutes. Still, it is a huge win for Ireland.
For NZ I thought we played alright. It was our first game so I wouldn't expect them to click straight away. Emery was probably the stand out player. To be honest, I think he is probably better than some of the centres we have playing SupeRugby. Keresoma was pretty good as was Ahki. I think Heenan was very hard working as was Tupou. I think Taufua is decent at what he does but from that I rate Tupou and Heenan as better players. Was it just me or was Bryn Hall a bit slow to get the ball out at times (he seemed to disappear a bit, too). Curtis was good in defense but I don't think he'll end up being much more than a provincial player at best.
I look forward to seeing Tu'ungafasi getting some more game time (hopefully against the Welsh). I hope he gets some game time for Auckland. He couldn't possibly do worse than Mailau.
Agree with that analysis. As you and others have mentioned Emery was the best player on the park. He was like a man among boys, which is a bit ironic given he is the youngest player in the NZ team (the only player available next year too), and was one of the smallest. He made something happen whenever he touched the ball, and always seemed to make the right decisions (both in attack and defense). Can't wait to see more of him against better teams.
Akhi was good, and West looks to be a good running 10, but he seems to lack a bit of distance on his punt - when Eade came on he was punting it a good 10-15m more when kicking for touch. West's limited punt will not cost the team against weak teams (as they can simply run the ball out of their half), but Eade's punting could be handy against the better teams. I agree Hall was a bit slow to the breakdown at times, but other than that looked solid, while Kerosema was very sharp (as you mentioned). I agree Curtis looks a bit limited - he actually did pretty well at times, but he lacks any explosive pace or power, so I feel will struggle to make an impact against quality players.
Both locks looked solid, and like you I was impressed with Tu'ungafasi when he came on. I though Taufua was good with ball in hand, but there certainly has plenty of competition in the loose-forwards (and Manu hasn't even played yet). I wasn't as impressed with Tupou as you seem to be - he looked a solid hard-working player, but lacked a bit of power/aggression to me. Given his size I was expecting him to break tackles or hit hard in defense, but he was more Reuben Thorne than Jerome Kaino to me. I was very impressed with Heenan, though am not sure whether 7 is the right position for him. He was ok at the breakdown, but his real strength was with the ball in hand - he seemed to break the first tackle every time, and has some beautiful handling skills. I though Blake made a good impact when he came on (though needs to be careful about lifting in the tackle) - I wonder whether they will consider starting both Heenan and Blake on the flanks against the top teams (as they did in the second half).