2017 versus 2013
Completely pointless of course but I thought I'd compare the likely squad to the 2013 gang.
2013
Rory Best
Richard Hibbard
Tom Youngs
2017
Ken Owens
Jamie George
Rory Best
The 2013 hookers don't look too exciting to us now, but Youngs and Hbbard offered a lot back then. Youngs' carrying was really crucial and Hibbard brought huge physicality. Rory Best possibly was more impactful at the breakdown back in 2013. All of the above gave away a little at the lineout on paper, though Youngs who I was worried about went fine. the 2017 line out should be stronger and the scrum at least as good. Not a lot of difference between the two sets.
2013
Dan Cole
Adam Jones
Matt Stevens
2017
Tadgh Furlong
Dan Cole
WP Nell
We haven't a tight head prop with the power and reliability of Adam Jones. However Furlong is a strong scrummager and more in evidence around the field. WP Nell a better scrummager than Stevens whilst Dan Cole has 4 years more experience. Overall, happier with the likely 2017 lions.
2013
Mako Vunipola
Cian Healy
Gethin Jenkins
2017
Jack McGrath
Mako Vunipola
Cian Healy
Tough to compare since two of the players could be the same. I think the 2017 versions of these players will be more reliable at the scrum where we were a little weak as time. Once you bring in corbisiero to consideration it's a little different of course, and I don't know that Healy has ever been the same after some of his injuries. Still I'm happier with the 2017 set if only because of consistency.
2013
Ian Evans
Richie Gray
Alun Wyn Jones.
Paul O'Connell
Geoff Parling
2017
Alun Wyn-Jones
Joe Launchbury
Maro Itoje
Johnny Gray
Iain Henderson
We're likely to have a lot more quality than in 2013. Ian Evans was a reliable old workhorse but Richie Gray was just the best of an inspiring bunch. Who would have expected Parling to go a few years before 2013? The overall level is a step above in 2017 with a likely set of extremely mobile and busy locks. The only worry is the leadership value - O Connell and Paling (and Jones) were good leaders back in 13 and so they'll be more pressure on Alun-Wyn. Tougher selection choices in 2017 for sure.
2013
Tom Croft
Dan Lydiate
Sean O'Brien
Justin Tipuric
Sam Warburton(c)
Taulupe Faletau
Jamie Heaslip
2017
CJ Stander
Sam Warburton
Justin Tipuric
Hamish Watson
Billy Vunipola
Toby Faletau
James Haskell? Jamie Heaslip?
This is difficult but I think the back-row was very strong in 2013 despite the presence of Lydiate and Croft. Croft in his defence offered something more different than we are likely to have in 2017, despite his flaws. Despite how competitive it is I'm not massively enthused about the 2017 set. Added to which the form of O'Brien, Warburton, Faletau and Heaslip was far better in 2013. Overall I prefer 2013 but a back-row of Stander, Warburton and Vunipola could be excellent.
2013
Conor Murray
Mike Phillips
Ben Youngs
2017
Conor Murray
Rhys Webb
Greg Laidlaw
Lions seem to be in better shape for 2017. Conor Murray has only improved, Philips is gone and we have other choices for a pesky sniping 9 than we did in 2013. Gatland will value game management which is why Laidlaw has a strong chance, though I think we stand to get enough of that from our 10s and would instead go for Youngs on the off chance he'll decide to do something good. I'm happier with the likely 9s for 2017
2013
Owen Farrell
Jonathan Sexton
2017
Jonathan Sexton
George Ford
We have more options than in 2017. I have no idea frankly how the Irish would compare Sexton to his 2013 self, but Farrell has improved significantly and Ford will attack the All-Blacks if he gets a place. That's how we win.
2013
Jonathan Davies
Brian O'Driscoll
Jamie Roberts
Manu Tuilagi
2017
Owen Farrell
Jonathan Joseph
Robbie Henshaw
Jonathan Davies
Not completely convinced about our midfield options this time. We had bags of potential last time and Jonathan Davies was in better shape but more to the point the combinations last time seemed more obvious to me. I have doubts about Farrell at 12 alongside Sexton who could clash. Not sure it will work quite the same as it does for England. I'd quite like to see Henshaw and Joseph together, but it feels unlikely. I think Davies will go because he offers something different though I'd take Daly instead myself. Gatland may still surprise us.
2013
Tommy Bowe
Alex Cuthbert
Sean Maitland
George North
2017
George North
Liam Williams
Anthony Watson?
Tommy Seymour?
It's that thing of the first choice options in 2013 were probably better, or at least more in form, while the overall quality level of the 2017 bunch will be better. Bearing in mind that injuries do happen, I expect our bunch will prove to be better overall than the 2013 lot, even though I thought Bowe and North were the single best pairing.
2013
Leigh Halfpenny
Stuart Hogg
Rob Kearney
2017
Stuart Hogg
? Kearney?
I think overall things were better in 2013. Hogg is better now but Kearney and Halfpenny were both better back then. It's also an area where I feel clueless as to who will actually go. It depends upon whether Liam Williams, Anthony Watson or Elliott Daly could be seen as full-backs. People give Halfpenny stick but in 2013 his overall game was excellent and I would argue Halfpenny was the single most important part of the 2013 win.
Overall, this was far harder than I expected. Because of how competitive I think 2017 is for places I'd almost come to think that we're a lot better automatically than in 2013. On review, there's absolutely no room for fillers such as Matt Stevens on this tour and you can bet that injury calls up are of a higher quality than Brad Barritt and Billy Twelvetrees - but that doesn't mean our first choices are better at all. I'm worried about the form of some of our best potential back-rowers and Taken as units:
Hookers : Similar
Props: Better
Locks: Better
Back-row: Similar/weaker
Half-backs: Better
Centres: Similar/weaker
Wings: Overall Better
Full-backs: Weaker
In short I've not convinced we're strengthened enough to beat the all-blacks. I think we're lose at least 2 midweek games and at most we have a shot at one test win. I think if Gatland tries to play his usual style we'll get seriously beat. If he picks creative and attacking players across the board and a big pack I think we'll do better. Wow, I'm negative - but the question is am I being fair?