This thread has turned into a cluster**** i can't be arsed to properly read, so heres a quxik sumation on main issues from yours turely.
1. BOD dropping, I'd like to say I would be ok if it were for a player who was undoubtedly in better form but I probably wouldn't. Anyway if Davis and/or Roberts were truly playing well enough to warrant the dropping of the best center ever it wouldn't cause such an outrage. Thats the problem I don't see Gatland propping BOD for an Welsh player I see him ripping him for a less good Lion.
2. Going back to what this clueless arheshole knows, Gatland has made something along 11 changes across the 3 tests, some injury enforced are acceptable but for the lions making changes is just not helpful form test to test, so he deiced to go back to what he knows but frankly what he knows can;t beat the Aussies
anyway rip **** into me guys i'll be cheering on the lions despite the mess thats been made.
Was just been sure because you said Wales were more successful but England have 4 6N ***les with 1 slam and 1 World Cup with 2 final appearances and I think that better than 3 6Nations with 2 slams and in my opinion 2000-2006 was alot tougher than recent times (That includes Mike Ruddocks feat). But again it irrelevant
And it's simply put Gatland has put on a gamble and has his reputation on the line. Regardless of the result this tour has gone down as 1 of the more flat and boring tours no fun. But tomorrow we will find out was there a master stroke or did Lady Luck leave when was needed more than ever?
I think that's similar to the side that we gave a spanking in the 6N.Wales have been more successful than England in recent times though. 3 six nations ***les (2 of them grand slams) and semi final place in WC , from 2005-13. England on the other hand have only claimed one six nations ***le since the end of 2003. Gatland has done a hell of a lot of good for Wales' development whilst coaching them to championship wins.
Long story short...What I'm trying to say is, this is what the selected squad should have been for saturday:
1. Paul James (Wales)
2. Richard Hibbard (Wales)
3. Adam Jones (Wales)
4. Alun-Wyn Jones (Wales)
5. Ian Evans (Wales)
6. Dan Lydiate (Wales)
7. Justin Tipuric (Wales)
8. Toby Faletau (Wales)
9. Mike Philips (Wales)
10. Dan Biggar (Wales)
11. Shane Williams (Wales)
12. Jamie Roberts (Wales)
13. Jonathan Davies (Wales)
14. George North (Wales)
15. Leigh Halfpenny (Wales)
Bench: Bevington (Wales), Mitchell (Wales), Owens (Wales), J King (Wales), Ryan Jones (Wales), Lloyd Williams (Wales), Hook (Wales), Cuthbert (Wales)
What do you guys think? I want to hear especially from the English and Irish here, I think they're gonna love my intelligent choices.
Aye, you did well after that didn't you, fair play.I think that's similar to the side that we gave a spanking in the 6N.
Aye, you did well after that didn't you, fair play.
I think that's similar to the side that we gave a spanking in the 6N.
Well a particular part of it..that they didn't win.Are you referring to the Six Nations that Wales won?
Well a particular part of it..that they didn't win.
Wales have been more successful than England in recent times though. 3 six nations ***les (2 of them grand slams) and semi final place in WC , from 2005-13. England on the other hand have only claimed one six nations ***le since the end of 2003. Gatland has done a hell of a lot of good for Wales' development whilst coaching them to championship wins.
Just to throw it out there:Meh, they were luring the other teams into a false sense of security and then.. BAM!! 30 points to England's 3
Another reason in favour of BOD is the Welsh team have a horrid tendency to fade in the last five minutes and concede a stupid late try in previous games against Australia. Want to stop something like that, well maybe a slightly less exhausting game plan would help, but you also want cool, experienced heads, people who can speak and calm down where necessary, gee up where necessary - people like BOD. People talk a lot about athleticism, power, tactics, skill, understanding etc.etc. a huge part of Test Rugby is in the mind. Who's hungrier for it, who's calmer, who's sharper... no one was hungrier than BOD for this. No one's more of a big game animal. I hope I'm wrong, but I really do think this is a big mistake - people cast it in terms of their attacking form, but big games are often tight affairs, the game plan is an attritional one, and defensive security and experience are huge factors in games like this, which is hugely in O'Driscoll's favour.
Hopefully the bench will tip things towards us instead.