- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 7,012
If you don't like that you don't like tier 1.5 rugbyOk. Enjoy your kickathon. I'm outa here.
If you don't like that you don't like tier 1.5 rugbyOk. Enjoy your kickathon. I'm outa here.
A man down for 77 minutes and you expect tries?Really don't understand this, they didn't score one try and just kicked goals.
I didn't see any belly fires in them, in fact not in any one of the 30 players on that pitch.
Was I watching a different game from everyone else who actually enjoyed that?!.
Really don't understand this, they didn't score one try and just kicked goals.
I didn't see any belly fires in them, in fact not in any one of the 30 players on that pitch.
Was I watching a different game from everyone else who actually enjoyed that?!.
Quite correct. Life's never been the same since you can't slap a man about the face with a glove and declare 'pistols at dawn'. It's just not cricket.It's ungentlemanly to score tries while down a man. England just did the honorable thing.
I would expect France to be in there as wellYes but SA, Ireland, All Blacks, Wales, Argentina, England, Australia probably will and that's a pretty standard quater finals line up for most world cups.
I want to try here …
I don't enjoy a 'kickathon'. However, from a tactical POV, England did exactly the right thing. Trying to play running rugby a man down is pure suicide. Let me explain as simply as possible: 1) running rugby is about creating overlaps which is hard to the point of being almost impossible with a numerical disadvantage 2) running rugby is fricking tiring. When you lose a man as early as England did, you can't do it without being completely knackered by the 50min - which then means you lose badly in the last 30.
Does that help?