• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

England vs USA Eagles

And where do you live mate. London? Most places in England are **** holes. Wales is no different to any other place except we have more places of natural beauty. Lol.
That's fair
The whole North of England is one big **** hole. You can throw in the South West as well. He he.
First part of that is fair.
But you and I will have a major falling out over the latter! :mad:
 
And where do you live mate. London? Most places in England are **** holes. Wales is no different to any other place except we have more places of natural beauty. Lol.
I live in the midlands and it's lovely. No idea why you'd think London, I'm a saints fan.
 
I live in the midlands and it's lovely. No idea why you'd think London, I'm a saints fan.
I don't. Midlands. Lol. The biggest **** hole of the lot. Wolverhampton, Birmingham, Worcester? Lol. And you have the audacity to slag off Wales. I wouldn't bring my dog up in the midlands.
 
As is the Midlands before you start taking my comment seriously. Shame about the people in the midlands but the Malvern hills and that are very nice.

Anyway, enjoy the game tomorrow. Cheerio
 
Agreed, we've got all of 2 players who are regular starters; 1 who could be called a regular bencher, and 1 other who's a semi-regular bencher.
You'd be hard pressed to find a less experienced international team.

You could argue that Slade and Underhill are wasted caps, as we already know everything we need to about them - but you need a leadership group of some description; players who are comfortable at international level and won't get caught like a rabbit in the headlights, and allow others to play around them. Usually, you're looking for that in the spine of the team - from the spine of this team there's not one single capped international.

Out of 23 players, 21 of them could be classed as "unknown quantities" at test level.
To be fair to Eddie, I think there's a very high chance we'd also have seen Ribbans and Barbeary had they been available. Possibly West and Sleightholme too but for injury.
 
Well, the countryside bits are alright. I go up there regularly as my Mrs is from up that way.
TBF, I think that if we're putting on our serious hats; within GB...
All the cities and bigger towns are generally dumps - with the odd exceptions like York, St David's, bits of Edinburgh, maybe Bath.
All the rural areas have plenty going for them - with the odd exceptions like East Anglia, maybe the Somerset levels.

Of course, it could, possibly maybe, be that I'm just a country boy
 
TBF, I think that if we're putting on our serious hats; within GB...
All the cities and bigger towns are generally dumps - with the odd exceptions like York, St David's, bits of Edinburgh, maybe Bath.
All the rural areas have plenty going for them - with the odd exceptions like East Anglia, maybe the Somerset levels.

Of course, it could, possibly maybe, be that I'm just a country boy
Depends what you fancy. I love London. Hands down the best place on this island and probably Europe (not that I'm very well travelled) but a lot of people hate London

Anyway, widely of subject so I'll leave it there.
 
I don't. Midlands. Lol. The biggest **** hole of the lot. Wolverhampton, Birmingham, Worcester? Lol. And you have the audacity to slag off Wales. I wouldn't bring my dog up in the midlands.
Warwick, kennilworth, Lemmington all the lovely villages.
 
The North for me is anywhere north of me. So yeah colchester is in the north
 
The levels are fine just surrounded by excellent areas like the Mendips and Quantocks

Bit like Tewkesbury on a larger scale.
That's fair - bit of a dump and a bit boring themselves; but easy access to some fantastic areas (which is kinda why we chose Tewkesbury in the first place).

If only I had a car and could reach them (lost in the floods 10 months after arriving)
 
Top