- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Messages
- 2,218
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
My feeling from the few super rugby Australia games I watched was that they were missing a lot of tackles. I wondered then whether they had substantially improved their attack or if their defence was just poor.Well for 40 minutes in that game you felt the Wallabies had half a chance but Kudos to the AB's they just lifted the intensity at the start of the second half. Australia created a couple of chances which they didn't take and they were a poor second at the breakdown again. Man of the match for me would have to be Caleb Clarke but Savea and Cane weren't too far behind. I think the task in front of Rennie has just been laid bare. The defence which wasn't great last week at times was very poor today. The Aussies seemed to be missing a lot of first up tackles which you just can't do against NZ. I think the worrying thing for Australia was that when they were put under pressure, some of the bad old habits from under Michael Cheika returned. I.e. loose kicking and inaccurate passing.
i feel for Frizell, there is a section of the public that just dont like him, ive seen lots of comments already about him doing nothing in particular during the game....and im sitting there thinking he'd done great...i assume the truth is somewhere in betweenour loosies did awesome. savea and cane were obvious but frizell did loads of darkarts and made much needed turnovers and tackles
felt the ABs just lessened the errors . Aus attacked lots but just didnt make inroads and started running out of ideas.
that korobeite try that was held up was the turning point. dont know how korobeite didnt score that one, it was a butchered and a coach killer.
i dont think Aussie were awful, lots of positives for aussie rugby, AB's were always going to bounceback at eden park...the real test will be if aussie can bounce back on their home turfBeen watching the highlights, were NZ sublime in attack, Australia awful in defence or a bit of both?
frizell was awesome in the first bled game as well. put up sht load of tackles and didn't miss one.my only area of concern was still our inability to get the ball wide, to counter the rush, Clarke's big runs came when he came looking for the ball infield or when we went blind. so much came from broken play or turnovers, i just want to see a backline move completely open a team up
aussie werent awful. NZ were quite deliberate in their attack and defence.Been watching the highlights, were NZ sublime in attack, Australia awful in defence or a bit of both?
yeah, i thought he was good last week too...people just seem to expect him t run through everyone like he did during super rugbyfrizell was awesome in the first bled game as well. put up sht load of tackles and didn't miss one.
agree with the rush defence, but imo its not getting the ball out wide quick enough that is the issue. u need to manipulate the D line, especially a rush d. a little grubber behind the d line or a skip pass to someone running straight. i felt we hadnt earnt the right to go wide in the first test, whereas bled2 we were more than willing to run the fringes and establish gainline there first.
yeah shame cos frizzels earnt his spot. bled2 he was way better, but the bled1 draw wasnt frizells fault. he was immense in that test.yeah, i thought he was good last week too...people just seem to expect him t run through everyone like he did during super rugby
agreed, not just get wide early, more seem to not be able to make space, our backline moves seemed to end in midfield, either with a break or ruck...i wold love to see Clarke with a 20m run up out wide
i gotta disagree. ABs just played with little error. Aus did OK but with ABs not gifting them with mistakes it meant Aus had to do loads more right in order to counter the ABs.Absolute shocker from the Wallabies in this one. No one to blame but themselves. I couldn't even fault the reffing this time round. Gardiner was consistent through the whole game with advantage.
Clarke is an 80min player, he came off injured. You could see he was getting attention before he was pulled and then limped off the ground.from memory I think Bridge did the exact same thing the previous week
It does create a selection problem, Bridge was a massive find last year and he is a more complete player than Clarke. I guess it doesn't really matter now Bridge is out for the rest of the season.
Will be interesting to see how Clarke progresses, he should still be considered a project player. Wasn't that long ago he made a bad mistake that cost the game in the North vs South match, he also doesn't seem like an 80min player at this stage so it pretty much costs us a bench slot to start him. He wont be starting every week either so we will likely get a look at Jordon soon too. But his running game is an element the All Blacks attack can really use, it also seems like he knows his strengths and doesn't try and do too much. He sticks to what works for him. But he will want to work more on his passing game.
Was good to see PUJ do well too, cant have too much depth. To me he has looked like future all black material for quite a while.