- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 20,670
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Te'o is the gamebreaker you want, Ringrose not going is a great call...
Te'o is the gamebreaker you want, Ringrose not going is a great call...
I'd imagine it was more JJ vs Ringrose considering gatland was always going to take a bosh centre.
Also, I didn't see the game, but I've seen a LOT of people slagging off Anthony Watson today, apparently he made Wade's defence look like Joe Worsley - thoughts?
As I said earlier it's nothing to do with game breaker either. It's simply put. Ringrose is Warrenball could smash his confidence, physically break him and burn him out. Ringrose is not a bulky 13 who'll truck it up. He's physically not there at this time. His game is footwork and gaps.
I don't see another centre in the British Isles to touch Joseph, he's class, Joseph was always going to be a shoe in for the Gatling gun... a player like Teo, a big physical beast, to play alongside him would help his chances of squeaking a line break.
Ringrose has not done anything to impress me at the top level as yet. Plenty of time though.
Snarky, slightly bitter drunk comment after a loss by me there but pick the best players and build around them, Ringrose is better than 4 of the 5 available 13's and is breathing down Joseph's neck an underprepared sxhibition side aren't going to outsmart NZ so its common sense to pick guys who can score from anywhere, create space for others and defend with their heads up, at 13 this is Ringrose and Joseph both have their flaws and moments of stupidy but they're capable of winning big games and not just slowly and gallantly losing them like Te'o and JD2 will in an incohesive side against the world's best. Farrell, Henshaw, Ringrose and Joseph were really the obvious choices of centres after the Euro QF's and by the sounds of things he's picked two while not holding the other in the highest regard.
Te'o won't be starting hopefully as he has the minor barrier of Robbie Henshaw (who NZ fans should be acquainted with by now) ahead of him at 12, and the English incumbent 13 ahead of him in that position. Henshaw and Te'o would be an awful match anyway. I'm also not sure Te'o brings the kind of gamechanging impact Gatland has cited in the New Zealand bench that he wants to bring to the Lions. He's solid in most every aspect, but not a game changer.I don't see another centre in the British Isles to touch Joseph, he's class, Joseph was always going to be a shoe in for the Gatling gun... a player like Teo, a big physical beast, to play alongside him would help his chances of squeaking a line break.
Ringrose has not done anything to impress me at the top level as yet. Plenty of time though.
Daly is also ahead of Ringrose as a 13 right now, though Gatland may be seeing him as a winger still..
Find me an Irish back who hasn't been called thatIt's a lazy comparison, but he's being called the next O'Driscoll for a reason.
You're already 2 years too late for any [redacted] comparisons, not to mention being utterly ridiculous in comparing a natural flanker to a natural centre whilst ignoring every single match played for class, form and learning.Te'o has the capacity to go the way of Burgess. He's played a small number of international games at centre, and I'd suggest he's not ready to plan at the top top level at centre. At the level you need to be at to compete against the all blacks, having some who can hit big won't be enough. I would be very nervous about his ability to develop strong positioning partnerships in such a short space of time given his lack of experience playing union. Following Sam burgess at the World Cup there was a brilliant article by Gordon D'Arcy, linked below, about how important such positioning is.
Bath's defence as a whole was pretty woeful; I think it's because TB's trying to get them playing completely different defensive patterns, and making the changes mid-season, rather than with a pre-season to do so; with a particularly stark difference now we're actually getting some first choice players back (who are essentially back to square one on that learning curve).Also, I didn't see the game, but I've seen a LOT of people slagging off Anthony Watson today, apparently he made Wade's defence look like Joe Worsley - thoughts?
Also, I didn't see the game, but I've seen a LOT of people slagging off Anthony Watson today, apparently he made Wade's defence look like Joe Worsley - thoughts?
Well to be fair Earls is way off as he's a natural wing, Fitz was class but ruined by injury, and people have said it of Henshaw, which also makes no sense as he's quite direct as a player, but in terms of running style, evasiveness and speed he's the most similar to O'Driscoll as a player I've seen for us. Both not particularly big men but always seem to spot opportunities. I'm sure he himself hates the comparison, but so many pundits have noted it and Drico to an extent agreed and is constantly hyping him on BT and in the press. He's obviously way off being that good yet, but if he stays fit it's gonna be the shot that's heard around the world. If I'm allowed two non-Munster Irish player hypes a year they go to Ringrose and Dan Leavy. I get 10 Munster hypes. Only fair.Find me an Irish back who hasn't been called that
Definitely heard it said about Earls and Luke Fitz
Find me an Irish back who hasn't been called that
Definitely heard it said about Earls and Luke Fitz