If i have to take a gamble and guess who it is then i say its Springbok performance analyst Lindsay Weyer. But thats complete speculation.Also, this below. He isn't a rugby journalist, but definitely one to normally follow on rugby in SA (Included the translate for all, note this was commented on the latest JacoJohan post):
View attachment 11874
NO....there's NO excuse. This is low class, he's an embarrassment to South Africa.You can say thats Rassie though
I just love stats in rugby…..
AWJ's 15 tackles were 50% more than the next best - Henshaw's 10 (and 3 times as many as Itoje).
His 7 metres carried were the same as Itoje, Curry and Conan combined.
I already said I meant that is not Rassie.NO....there's NO excuse. This is low class, he's an embarrassment to South Africa.
Rookie!But i wont call a guy who won us a world cup an embarrassment.
Rookie!
We regularly call Clive Woodward an embarrassment in England
No royal honour will ever be as farcical as Joe Simmonds getting whatever he got last yearI'm glad you omitted Sir. One of the worst knighthoods of all time - bad day at the office for the Queen.
Biggar passed three times. Three.
I'll raise you Paul Collingwood's MBE for his 17 run contribution to the 05 Ashes.No royal honour will ever be as farcical as Joe Simmonds getting whatever he got last year
Crikey, but you're not wrongJimmy Saville's contribution to noncery?
Non SH backs passing stats are all shocking:
4: Henshaw
3: Biggar
2: Hogg, Harris & Farrell
1: Watson, McVdM, Daly.
I would say that was because they were all too busy running except…..
Our 'impact' subs of Price, Farrell and Daly made not a metre between them. Chuck in Harris and Murray and the dial still doesn't move. McVdM infinitely improves things with his metre.
Our 10 backs between them ran for 48m which is less than half the length of the pitch. And also less than the 51 managed by our starting pack.
Can Jonny Hill feign a strained mullet or something so we can get Manu on a plane?
Hogg was terrible in the air. Got to go I'm afraid.Sober reading isn't it, while I am all for advocating changes (Hogg has not done enough for me as a Scot), how hard can we be on the backs when they saw no ball in hands?
Agree with all this.Watched the game finally, really wish I hadn't. More or less went how I expected in the end, SA kept their focus and reaped the rewards. If the lions ring the changes today I'd still have them as marginal favourites though because even though SA are probably the best team out there at playing 3+ consecutive weeks it's a huge ask to beat a team that can bring in about five players who are very close in quality and arguably better in some cases than the guys they'll replace.
If I was in charge I'd bring in Wyn Jones, Henderson, Beirne (6), Faletau, Price, Adams and Williams and Watson and Russell to the bench. Harsh on Conan who has consistently done what's asked of him to drop out completely but he's such an attritional player that I can't see him having a winning impact anyway. The rest can't have any major complaints.
You'd really want Sexton and Slade as options to bring in though, it wouldn't result in total rugby but you'd definitely get the strong runners the lions do have in the backs to see a bit of action.
Will reserve judgement until the teams are announced but just by virtue of the changes the lions can make I'd have them slight favourites in an attritional tie though. I really hope I'm wrong because they were so bad on Saturday, displaying exactly why Gatland isn't a popular coach, it'd be a shame if more success followed.
Only saw the takes he made in the highlights, I think Williams has to be due a run, bench Hogg in the hope that the game opens up and he finds some formHogg was terrible in the air. Got to go I'm afraid.