- Joined
- Sep 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,166
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
No, that's not what i'm saying, i'm saying that unless you know how to interpret the data the stats return then you're just whistling in the wind, and waving a tackle count as some proof of someone being world class, is meaningless unless you understand how to interpret that.
No, i'm saying it's OK to miss a tackle if the outcome of that is a positive one for the team - most teams mark on positive/negative otucome and not "how many did he make".
The system Les Kiss uses allows for missed tackles in this way it is the same scoring system as the England one if the tackel is missed but it results in a mistake, or driving the ball carrier into a worse area of the field then it is marked as positive.
again, depends on how and why and what your role within the team is.
because i don't need to. just PM me your opta password and we can use the same Data source to draw our conclusion?
You're the one who said he's a back row he doesn't go wide... you're the one who made that comparison, not me.
At top it's not too different but again believe what you want. I only used what you said was basis so again you move goal posts as you really showing your not interpreting much.
But to miss odd 1 tackle fair enough but to miss few. Come off it if you miss a tackle it's only positive if a teammate saves you.
Can't email password as I am using an IRFU base and wouldn't give out details or software to download. But I'm sure if you do your own analysis it's there online.
But again I glad to see Argentina have roles where an 8s role isn't to make much metres and miss a tackle as its positive. Ha you getting some good excuses in. It's not even about POM being world class for me any more just enjoying your excuses and digging of hole every time