• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

[2015 Six Nations] Ireland vs England (Round 3)

just showing that stats can be maniupulated however you want mate. As i have said all along they are almost redundant without context.







Yep, and you also deliberetly left out the two othe rpeople i mentioned and went purely for the one you thought you could get at... you also tried to spin it that France & England in the 6 Nations is the same as playing NZ & SA in the Rugby Championship (#lol!)



not false, just cherry picked.




Yep, cherry picked.

What's cherry picked as I said over 4 games. Ha you genuinely haven't a clue and seem to be a marathon bull****ter. At least your consistent. You say false then I say it's not and you just change to cherry pick and keep going ha.
Again I stated why I stopped at 1 but well in all your bull****ting and spoofing you missed that.
And I said their of similar levels and it was actually NZ just as both played SA and Aus. But again it was stated but again your proven to be spoofing.
Your redundant without context yet spend 2 days bull****ting, showing you obviously haven't a clue and to top it all off keep going. Maybe you could've researched instead and get some knowledge of you want me to do other 2 for you over their last 4 games I will later if it suits you. Also I haven't even tried show you up you've done quite the job solo.
 
What's cherry picked as I said over 4 games. Ha you genuinely haven't a clue and seem to be a marathon bull****ter. At least your consistent. You say false then I say it's not and you just change to cherry pick and keep going ha.
Again I stated why I stopped at 1 but well in all your bull****ting and spoofing you missed that.
And I said their of similar levels and it was actually NZ just as both played SA and Aus. But again it was stated but again your proven to be spoofing.
Your redundant without context yet spend 2 days bull****ting, showing you obviously haven't a clue and to top it all off keep going. Maybe you could've researched instead and get some knowledge of you want me to do other 2 for you over their last 4 games I will later if it suits you. Also I haven't even tried show you up you've done quite the job solo. ��

Maybe your a good laugh I'll give that ha.
1295735.large.jpg
 
I know I'm one to talk but guys this has been going on all day and It's going absolutely nowhere.
 
Oh, the irony.

not really, where did i start calling people bullsh*tters, idiot, telling people they need to get some knowledge and the rest of the rubbish Muffin's hurled around my point which ahs remained stats aren't the be all and end all.... *rhetorical question*

also yer mans figures aren't even right for the games he quoted, they are out by one or two, but still they are incorrect.

- - - Updated - - -

I know I'm one to talk but guys this has been going on all day and It's going absolutely nowhere.

on the contrary it's getting somewhere now I've got the time to check his facts and unpack the data. :)
 
not really, where did i start calling people bullsh*tters, idiot, telling people they need to get some knowledge and the rest of the rubbish Muffin's hurled around my point which ahs remained stats aren't the be all and end all.... *rhetorical question*

Referring to our 'exchange' yesterday.
 

Not sure I get lemons but look forward to your stats and resins you don't rate POM. Pull finger out so and state how many games were at 6 like I did, the games and what you got. No bull**** we've learnt you got a TRFie for that nailed
 
Not sure I get lemons but look forward to your stats and resins you don't rate POM. Pull finger out so and state how many games were at 6 like I did, the games and what you got. No bull**** we've learnt you got a TRFie for that nailed

tell you what, i'll do just that when you can write a paragraph that makes sense.

- - - Updated - - -

FWIW I agree Ferris was much better player.

FWIW, i agree with you, about agreeing with him, that Ferris was a much better player.
 
Last edited:
tell you what, i'll do just that when you can write a paragraph that makes sense.

- - - Updated - - -



FWIW, i agree with you, about agreeing with him, that Ferris was a much better player.

I could say same for you regards sense I make few errors writing you bull**** though.

So here it is simple - produce your stats and don't shy away. You've sprouted enough crap. Put up or shut up simply. Or will you simply bull**** again and avoid it????
 
Last edited:
I know everyone's definitions are different on the score, but I have to say this conversation leaves me with the need to retreat to a stiff glass of whisky while muttering about insanity. The usage of statistics has been positively Disraelian and as for the idea that O'Mahony is World Class, well, I've never heard such rubbish. Based on the evidence of my eyes and stats. He wouldn't get into the All Blacks, not unless he converted to openside, he simply doesn't fit their mould as a blindside. Bluntly I don't know why he doesn't convert into an openside, which is closer to his actual role for Ireland, other than the presence of two very talented people who play at openside already in the Ireland squad.

Mindyou, one has to say Robshaw's claims should be dismissed equally briskly. Suppose you could make a case they both are if you like applying the term very loosely.

There is one world class flanker in either squad and he comes from Tullow and sells his mammie's bread. That should be crystal clear, but bias is very strange. Quite how he ended up regarded as the specialist openside while O'Mahony came to be regarded as the specialist blindside is a mystery for our times really.

p.s. Speaking of bias, Ulster really need a 6 more than a lock; Ireland really need a lock more than a 6; Ulster fans reckon he's better at 6 and the rest of yiz mostly think he's a lock. Funny that. The reality is he's nigh perfectly physically suited for either and is capable of outstanding performances at either, and brings a dimension to the Irish side that very few others can while doing so. The sole matter is translating his impact role at international level to a consistent 80 minute role. And that is mostly merely a matter of practice.
 
I could say same for you regards sense I make few errors writing you bull**** though.

So here it is simple - produce your stats and don't shy away. You've sprouted enough crap. Put up or shut up simply. Or will you simply bull**** again and avoid it????

Wait, what?

I have to post proof of my stats but take your stats on faith?

Seems fair.

Plenty of public stat sites out there (according to you), i suggest you google it and fill your boots.
 
GN10. You were bull****ting there about POM vs Wales 2014. And 1metre in 9 runs. Well few fact.

He had 1 turnover. No issue.
It was actually 1 m in 6 runs. Heaslip made 6m in 11, Best and Healy made 8m and POC and Toner mad 4m each. That's 31m. Poor for a team that man shamed their pack. Henry despite scoring and Ross made 0m However if you remember or watched that game our pack was dogged and excellent defensively but the damage that day was out wide and centres.
We defended more than Wales that day and they had more possession. So again stats showed that before you try and spoof. We beat Wales with our physicality in defence.
 
Wait, what?

I have to post proof of my stats but take your stats on faith?

Seems fair.

Plenty of public stat sites out there (according to you), i suggest you google it and fill your boots.

By the way I've all stats at a click here will do Kainos last 4 games so and rest see how right or wrong you are.
 
Top