- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,019,965
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Blew my mind when I saw those stats - I remember our setpiece being decent but not best in the comp. Certainly had some ropey momentsScrum and lineout were the best in the 6n.
Blew my mind when I saw those stats - I remember our setpiece being decent but not best in the comp. Certainly had some ropey momentsScrum and lineout were the best in the 6n.
Yeah defo!Blew my mind when I saw those stats - I remember our setpiece being decent but not best in the comp. Certainly had some ropey moments
I think the RFU and England as a whole need to re-look at the overseas player rule. I'm not convinced it is working as intended. It may actually be better for the health of the premiership and national side if some of our top players are being exposed to a different league and the financial burden also rests with that league. Ok we may have a little less coordination with the national side, but the RFU already has **** all control over the clubs as it is anyway. Until there are central contracts and the RFU really starts to control the players throughout the year, I fail to see why it matters which clubs they are with. Having players overseas hasn't really hurt other teams and the premiership is creaking under the burden of trying to keep up with higher player wages but with much worse revenues than French clubs get.Sod off Armitage.
Would that be such a bad thing? It could force England to look at younger / fringe players in at least some of the internationals. Personally I'd like to see a bigger role for the Saxons too (in fact I'd like to see the club and international windows completely separated). Also, even though there are no rules internationally about release windows, unless there is something in the French domestic league, I don't see why players couldn't attempt to negotiate extra release dates? Sure it might be rejected but I don't think the Premiership has the resources to keep all the players here.Depending on how many took it up (and I think a fair amount would) it'd damage their 4th AI game - they'd have to price it like the England XV/Saxons games if they're not able to put out their best players
I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing but the RFU will view it as realistically ticket sales/prices are number 1 on their list of concernsWould that be such a bad thing? It could force England to look at younger / fringe players in at least some of the internationals. Personally I'd like to see a bigger role for the Saxons too (in fact I'd like to see the club and international windows completely separated). Also, even though there are no rules internationally about release windows, unless there is something in the French domestic league, I don't see why players couldn't attempt to negotiate extra release dates? Sure it might be rejected but I don't think the Premiership has the resources to keep all the players here.
Bath still fill out the stadium so I think if fans will still pay our extortionate fees for the absolute dross we produce, the rest of the league need not worry about ticket sales.I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing but the RFU will view it as realistically ticket sales/prices are number 1 on their list of concerns
I'm on record as being very against allowing players overseas to play for England, though, so I'm biased
Haven't seen the stats, but assume this is own ball stuff? Don't recall us really mullering anyone else's scrum or particularly threatening opposition line outs.Blew my mind when I saw those stats - I remember our setpiece being decent but not best in the comp. Certainly had some ropey moments
I get that to some extent but if a lot of these players are part of youth squad setups which are struggling at their WCs it suggests there's still a gap in the immediate future, I was thinking it would probably have to come from players a little younger.Four years is ages tbf - think it's 76 test matches?
You've got young players making their club breakthrough atm who could be 50cap test match animals by then
I've always said they built a very solid foundation. England were a good team 2011-2015. Their issue is they made a complete horlicks of the world cup playing a rugby league player at center with no real experience and not being able decide on the fly half combinations. Coupled with the absolutely braindead on field decision to not go for posts in the Wales match.Interesting take by Lancaster on what Ireland are doing right and England are not. In hindsight, it's amazing what the England coaching team before Jones have gone on to achieve. It seems all of them have gone on to some success and proven their credentials. Maybe for the lot the England job was just too early and we should look for coaches with proven pedigree in future rather than throwing in people who have not been at the top level that long? Lessons we clearly have not learned yet.
Look at the difference between NZ in 2007, who retained their coaching team despite their QF exit. Allowed them to learn from their mistakes. RFU kicked out Lancaster and co straight after 2015.I've always said they built a very solid foundation. England were a good team 2011-2015. Their issue is they made a complete horlicks of the world cup playing a rugby league player at center with no real experience and not being able decide on the fly half combinations. Coupled with the absolutely braindead on field decision to not go for posts in the Wales match.
And if they'd been knocked out in the group stage?Look at the difference between NZ in 2007, who retained their coaching team despite their QF exit. Allowed them to learn from their mistakes. RFU kicked out Lancaster and co straight after 2015.
It probably was too early for all, but the main problem was that while Lancaster is a fantastic hands on coach working with players, he simply wasn't head honcho material at that level. No shame in that, but we as fans could see it, so the players and coaching staff would have known as would Lancaster himself.Look at the difference between NZ in 2007, who retained their coaching team despite their QF exit. Allowed them to learn from their mistakes. RFU kicked out Lancaster and co straight after 2015.
Yet to lose in the pool stage at a RWC, but might happen later this year. All winning runs eventually come to an end.And if they'd been knocked out in the group stage?
Apparently there was no exit interview with Lancaster by RFU which is just unforgivable.It probably was too early for all, but the main problem was that while Lancaster is a fantastic hands on coach working with players, he simply wasn't head honcho material at that level. No shame in that, but we as fans could see it, so the players and coaching staff would have known as would Lancaster himself.
Lancaster seemingly got railroaded into the Burgess fiasco by his RFU paymasters. Say what you like about Jones, but it's hard to have seen that happening on his watch unless he'd actively wanted it.