Talking to some English friends and reading posts, you guys, in my opinion, seem to overestimate your players a bit, which ultimately leaves you feeling a bit underwhelmed after each match. Every time a new-ish player comes onto the scene he's hyped up far too much too quickly. Are your expectations too high? I'm not having a go, but it just seems like you talk about having multiple world class players in every position. Centres especially, I don't think there's any I'd have over Henshaw right now yet I've been told he would be 4th choice for England. Is Burrell really as good as people make out? Nowell? Maybe the reason you've chopped and changed centres so much is because they're all pretty average, not all world class. Obviously not everyone has this opinion.
Best tight five in the world? I'm not so sure. From yesterdays teams (not performance), if I could choose from either pack it would probably be:
1: McGrath or Healy tbh
2: Best
3: Cole
4: O'Connell
5: Attwood
6: POM
7: O'Brien
8: Vunipola
My opinion, but doesn't doesn't seem like the most dominant pack in world rugby. Even then, Toner is a tough call with his lineout work. Granted, Corbs is out, but even then many would have Healy over him.
I really like this English team compared to ones past, I think they'll make the semi's at least this year. But sometimes I think you should be more critical of players rather than blaming the coaching. (Although I agree, this team would be a lot better with somebody like Schmidt.)
And no, this isn't an 'arrogant English' post - it's just how I feel the English team is portrayed in the media and by others etc.
P.s to some posters suggesting Ireland don't have another gear or can't play with ball in hand, please go watch what Schmidt did with Leinster the past few seasons. & Then watch some of the games I listed earlier from Ireland last year that shows we can play more expansive. I've no doubt we can play wider with the talent in our back line. Doesn't mean we always will, but we certainly imo have the potential to.