goodNumber10
International
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2014
- Messages
- 6,027
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
McCaw, like any good mauling forward, is actually driving inwards and upwards, which he is quite entitled to do. Regardless of whether he has his arm around Palu's thigh, he would still be driving in and up the same way, so its immaterial. If he was not driving and instead only trying to lift Palu's leg, then I would agree with you, but he isn't, so I don't
He clearly has Palu's Leg and lifts it, hence his left leg stays down and his right leg doesn't.
McCaw has Palu below the knee, his leg is bent from being lifted, his lower leg is loose because of that, he gets underneath Palu because he is manipulating his leg, manipulating someones leg in a Maul is illegal and dangerous play iirc.
All we can see is that Read and Skelton are wrestling but its hard to tell if anything else is going on because we never see a close up view from Camera 6 (the sideline steadycam on that side of the field); the only view we get is from Camera 2 (the second elevated platform camera). If you reckon you see this as clear and obvious on TV, from the wrong side and 80 metres away, then you must have Superman vision. This all happens right in front of Wayne Barnes and I am 100% certain that, of all referees, he would call it in if Read even looked like he might have collapsed the maul.
He clearly drops his weight under Skelton's center of gravity, you can see it at the back left he has him around the waist and then drops and pulls - i don't really care if you disagree with me I'm not trying to convince you otherwise, I am just offering an opinion on what i saw, you're the person who went on the attack despite my original post clearly saying there was lots going on in both directions.
Bwwhahaha! I totally doubt that. Someone who is clearly and obviously as anti-New Zealand as you are would have been whining about that from the get-go if you saw it live.
I clearly say that i am going back through the video, i just didn't mention anything until i'd reviewed the video and confirmed my thoughts.
I have to say though that I am not I'm not surprised you see it the way you do. You work for G&GR; a website that publishes match analyses and columns that are more outright, one-eyed pro-Australian biased than any other place on the web, even SMH.
You are seeing things with your G&GR eye-patch.
It's no surprise that an Australian rugby website will be pro Australian, but I'm English, i have no affiliation to Australia or really G&GR. I don' work for them I just contribute the occasional video article analysis articles.
I'm not anti-NZ, you are just horrifically one eyed (hence the rather funny picture) to the point that when ever anyone crticises your boys you go massively out of your way to smear and argue with them - look at the lineout discussion the other week the lengths you went to with Kaplan (ridiculous), and with the scrum discussion in the other thread?
Nothing I've contributed has been anti-NZ, unobjective, nor criticised NZ - so how do you like them apples?
In over a year on this forum i can honestly say you never once said a NZ player is in the wrong, and always find a way to defend them.
You are about as unobjective as they come.
And Lastly on the editing:
Yeah, busted, and dishonest.
Not in the slightest, I have posted my edit history and PM'd Mr Fish about it. It p*sses me off i'm being made out dishonest and a liar when i absolutely did not edit the post in the way you and Heineken claim.
The Text was there, and even if you don't believe that it certainly was there when you replied the second time, you chose not to focus on it and feint being attacked because you are wrong and it works to change the subject.
Last edited: