Surely Ewis can deliver a better match synopsis than I can!!! Do one and I'll edit it in Ewis.....
That's right, for my knowledge is formidable.
The Aussies have the advantage of having more gold blond-haired players, while the French have more color variety to them. France will be missing a couple of prime hookers, including one with beautiful blond hair, so that's not cool. I really wish they both could've taken their maternity leave later in the calendar, but they deemed it necessary to do it now.
I think I'm being fair and objective when I say both sides have attractive fullbacks, although both very different in style. It can turn out to be a very handsome matchup between the two, for they both bring very sexy ballet-like movements to the pitch, and it's always a delight to set one's eyes on those young, athletic legs.
"Furthermore" is a composite word, and I'll use it right now. Furthermore, Australia's backs as a whole play the same velvet style they always have, and that can only keep the hormones seething with passion. It's like passionfruit, but just not a fruit and rather a playing style if I can afford the metaphor.
Both teams will have the same number of players altogether, and on the field at once, so no advantage there. The problem is France is going into this test without a coach though, and many theorize that this is a big flaw in team sports although it has yet to be exactly proven.
To be a little more serious now, France are much older than this Australian side, but mature men are not without their own distinct charm either. In fact....well, never mind.
Australia of course play with homegroundadvantage, which is now a proper term after months and months of evolution of the English language, and also home-ball advantage. France may find it difficult to get used to those strange balls they have there, and that alone could explain most if not the totality of their future woes to come.
France became a truly centralised kingdom under
Louis IX (reigned 1226–1270). Saint Louis has often been portrayed as a one-dimensional character, a flawless representant of the faith and an administrative reformer who cared for the governed ones. However, his reign was far from perfect for everyone: he made unsuccessful crusades, his expanding administrations raised opposition, and he burned Jewish books at the Pope's urging.
[17] His judgments were not often practical, although they seemed fair by the standards of the time. It appears Louis had a strong sense of justice and always wanted to judge people himself before applying any sentence. This was said about Louis and French clergy asking for excommunications of Louis' vassals:
[18]
Finally, Australia's biggest weakness, which is also their smallest flaw but could turn out to be essential to their success all the while being a risk in itself; and unto itself; is their ability to win games.
