I don't regard players moving abroad to attend schools for rugby reasons as not poaching. I don't think picking such players represents the moral high ground. Its probably better than Thomas Waldrom, but neither strikes me as a case for genuine national affiliation if we're getting all pure about players representing countries.
But I don't really care, the rules aren't getting changed because more countries benefit than don't, and I find dictating to people what nationality they are, or what they should believe about it, pointless. The main point is that the NZ union is clearly happy to take players of less than unblemished Kiwi'ness, and would probably take more if there were more worth taking, and therefore accusing us of a lack of shame is a cool story.
Tbh England should probably go for it, less of the not very good flash in the pan Kiwis our coachs seem enamoured of and in return we stop our Celtic cousins skimming our talent pools, but there we go.
But I don't really care, the rules aren't getting changed because more countries benefit than don't, and I find dictating to people what nationality they are, or what they should believe about it, pointless. The main point is that the NZ union is clearly happy to take players of less than unblemished Kiwi'ness, and would probably take more if there were more worth taking, and therefore accusing us of a lack of shame is a cool story.
Tbh England should probably go for it, less of the not very good flash in the pan Kiwis our coachs seem enamoured of and in return we stop our Celtic cousins skimming our talent pools, but there we go.