It's all pretty redundant talking about how a Jones coached lions would fare.
Gatlands mandate would have been to go down to NZ and get results. A drawn test series would have been acceptable 6 weeks ago, so very difficult to argue the success of it, and how someone else might have done better or worse.
Fact is, we will never know. Never get to see Billy Vunipola in a lions shirt against the ABs, Gray, Launchbury etc, as well as some on tour who never got close to a test appearance, even though they showed decent form.
I had my beefs about selection throughout, and it got pretty friggin rank in the 2nd and 3rd tests, but hey, water under the bridge. We drew, and even if I feel robbed a little, it's no shame to take a drawn series in NZ. Nothing flash about our approach, but hardly a surprise there. Not sure other coaches would be that much more open with their game plan against the ABs. It's all about controlling tempo as best you can, defending, and territory through kicking. Play to your own strengths, not your opposition's.
Same for the kiwis who moan our style is lousy as a spectacle. My response is that each Lions game was more gripping than many a super rugby clash where each teams end up with 5 or 6 tries a piece. Fact is, outside of NZ derbies, and NZ team games in SA, most super rugby games are blowouts and rather one sided crocks. NZ will continue to face more resilient opposition in future in the form of NH sides, I reckon.
In the end, on a personal level, the lions tour has been more exhilarating than the entire super rugby season to date. Not all that hard to do in reality. 7 or 8 true test match like engagements, and lots of close results. It's been a 6 week festival.