• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Steffon Armitage wanting to play for France.?!

...errr...

It's true though when he played with London Irish he was overlooked for England despite playing well.
My point is if loophole is there then he can exploit it.
I hate fact that rule is there and I'd have anger at that more than Armitage
 
He was capped several times by England while at London Irish, though. He didn't set the world alight (wasn't bad, but not amazing) so wasn't selected after those 5(?) caps.
I've no doubt if he was in England now he'd at least be in the EPS, if not our first choice 23 - his form really started going up in the season before he moved to Toulon and hasn't stopped rising. It's not his only route to International rugby, he could move back to London Irish if he wanted. Many England players will have turned down moves abroad because they know it'll hamper their international chances. Tom Palmer and James Haskell both moved back from France because they wanted to play for England.
Fair play if Steffon loves Toulon, I don't blame him for wanting to live there and earn ridiculous amounts of cash, but he knows that he's not going to play for England while there - I've got no sympathy for that, it's not like they pulled the rug out from underneath him, he knew that when he moved and when he signed a new contract.

If he felt English enough to run out in the red rose then he shouldn't be representing another country.
 
Last edited:
I can't accept that sort of justification - it's invalid IMO.

It's a bit like nicking someone's TV and saying "well they left their window open".

EDIT: and I agree with everything Olyy has said, above.
 
He was capped several times by England while at London Irish, though. He didn't set the world alight (wasn't bad, but not amazing) so wasn't selected after those 5(?) caps.
I've no doubt if he was in England now he'd at least be in the EPS, if not our first choice 23 - his form really started going up in the season before he moved to Toulon and hasn't stopped rising. It's not his only route to International rugby, he could move back to London Irish if he wanted. Many England players will have turned down moves abroad because they know it'll hamper their international chances. Tom Palmer and James Haskell both moved back from France because they wanted to play for England.
Fair play if Steffon loves Toulon, I don't blame him for wanting to live there and earn ridiculous amounts of cash, but he knows that he's not going to play for England while there - I've got no sympathy for that, it's not like they pulled the rug out from underneath him, he knew that when he moved and when he signed a new contract.

If he felt English enough to run out in the red rose then he shouldn't be representing another country.

I agree with all that. My point is he can have best of both. Not have to leave Toulon and play international rugby too. I'm just saying in his shoe - if he can do it and decided to then it's not him I'd have anger at but the rule itself.
I know he's been capped by England but he's never really been there as a 1st choice really. He stated it was part of reason he left.
My fear is this could be a gateway to bigger problems if it happened
 
Yeah, I agree with all that - this whole loophole is a gateway to ****ty things.

Also, I, too, can understand why he'd do it, I'd just have no respect for him if he did.
 
I can have empathy with players wanting to go back and play for there country of birth, TBH.

There are all sorts of legitimate reasons for people to want to represent a particular country - not after they've already been capped, IMO.
 
Well I think he's a ****, if that contributes to the debate in any way.
 
I can have empathy with players wanting to go back and play for there country of birth, TBH.

You wave goodbye to that dream the minute you pull on the jersey of another country. If he was still in the England side he wouldn't all of a sudden want to represent his country of birth.
 
did i miss something?

where does his country of birth come into this debate, he was born in Trinidad.
 
I think Tigs man means for the rule in general, rather than specifically Armitage. So a PI born player who picked up a cap or two for he wobblies or ABs.
 
I think the point Tigs was making was a general one, and Don then assumed that he was referring specifically to Steffon and that he was born in France.
 
wowwww hadn't been on here for a while. You English take this soooooooooooo seriously, just hold up for a second guys. I knew some of you had this sort of hyperbolic chauvinism about you, but this is downright comical for me to read here...you'll think this post is cynical, or sarcastic - it's not. This is actually funny to check out.
Like - THE MAN IS A TURNCOAT *************************** !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hope he ROTS IN HELL WITH ONIONS !!! (I remember reading something like that, maybe not the HELL part, but onions yes...).
Surely, you can't be that angry about this...I mean Armitage may have played for England, but he's not an "English player" like Wilko was or Robshaw, Wood, Youngs, Care today. Rugby style wise, he has no identity. He fits neither France nor England, in fact in world Rugby for a loosie he's just a complete anomaly. The fact that he played for England is due to the fact that he had a little piece of paper that stated he was English. If you're talking training and playing in places, he's done both France and England extensively over the course of his interesting career. It's not like he's a stranger to France.

Is it the fact that a player would play for two countries that is by default a taboo horrendous act that should be persecuted without the slightest second thought, mechanically ? Like, there's just no way this is justifiable ? By my tone, you'll understand I obviously don't think so.

Hypothetically, some dude who's played in France and England and then we "poach" him or, whatever if you don't like that term we "have him play for us" like 5 little games, 5 little caps, and then he plays in England again, in Prem, and decides to play for England, I mean sure wtvr, there's no actual loyalty he owes us, me as a French fan, or the nation of France. He's a player, that means he's a business man, has his own destiny nobody can criticize, it's his fkng career, life and family.
This isn't like some guy who's delivering all England's gameplan to France or other opponents, or has actually spat on England somehow...he's just following the course of his career. It's neutral, it doesn't really have a color...you say "turncoat" - I don't even think there is a coat to turn.

I mean, if I'm English and I see him in the street some day and I go "dude, no offense, but you're a turncoat" and he answered back (after he headbutts me): "dude, it's my life, my career. Both countries mean a lot to me and I've played my whole pro career between both territories and culturally I have ties with both...who the fk are you to tell me what I can or can't do again ?" - I'd have no answer. I'd just walk away with my tale betw. my legs, apologizing.

I mean this is less relevant, but what if I brought up hey these guys (Armitage bros) played in Nice earlier and were basically French, they're such turncoats for playing in England afterwards. Nah, fk that man. They're pro athletes, they play for whoever seduces them the most, and that means money, or other more humane things.

Tuilagi has an English side, he's not all Samoan, he's lived in England a while. If I'm Samoan I don't consider him a turncoat, even though his whole family's played for Samoa. Again, it's cool, it's pro sports. Just, seize your opportunities and go for it buddy...
Of course if you leave for a better country because you don't want to stay in the gutter where life is rough and the team isn't all that great but that's where you belong, that's a little disgusting. I'd rather sink on my ship than hop onto the next "bandwagon" boat, so to speak.

I remember a recent interview from Fekitoa, I believe he still could play for Tonga at that point. Early in the interview he goes "I want to play for the All-Blacks, because...they're the best team in the world". Fairplay, take your chances man, this is where you want to be because it'll bring the most out of you as an athlete, so be it. And that's all an athlete can ever desire - SHOULD ever desire.

Those are all different examples (from the Steffon A. one) with nuances, but I'm just stretching the topic to a few of its corners here.
 
He is a turncoat if he tries to play for France, simple as. This is international rugby. Once you pick a side you stick with them, there's no flip flopping here. This isn't the club game where you can follow the money or whatever else you want. Your argument is that he is as much French as English. Well even if that were so he's made his choice and should have to live with it.

Personally I find it shameful from Armitage and from France equally so. How embarrassing for France is it that they have to turn to English and South African castaways to try to make their own national team competitive? This is one of the biggest rugby nations on the planet, which a huge playing pool, yet this is what they're resorting to? I hate it when Ireland do it and we're way less successful traditionally than the French. What's the point of a national team if people can just trade away their nationalities on a whim?
 
The point is, Ewis, that it undermines the entire premise of international rugby.

It's what differentiates it from club rugby - your ******** about him not having an "English style" is entirely irrelevant.

I know you are opposed to nationalism and patriotism - but representing your country means a ****ing lot to a lot of people.
Enough to overwhelm them to the point where they cry uncontrollably during their national anthem.

That is a major reason why international rugby is inherrently more intense than club rugby - the emotional intensity.
If you compromise that (by allowing players to switch their allegiances) then you only serve to erode one of the things that makes the international game great.
 
Last edited:
Stopped reading Ewis' diarrhoea when I got to him mentioning how doesn't fit the English or French "style".
xpadsZe.gif
 
Just thought:
Stephen Ferris was born in Northern Ireland, so can get a British passport so is eligible for Team GB, so is eligible for England 7s (as the highest ranked GB side it's the side that acts as GB's qualifier) so could play for England - why is the RFU not pumping a ton of cash into cybernetic research to replace his knees and get him playing for England? :p
 
Top