psychic duck
International
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 5,094
Because dropping one player, at 13, doesn't cause the difference between a team that loses against Australia and a team that thrashes Australia. There was an overall improvement throughout the entire team, going from the second test (where the team played extremely bad) to the third.
Also, England have 2 wins and 0 losses single-handedly against Australia since the Lions tour. Ireland are 1-1. Australia haven't been a particularly tough side for a long time. They have a pack that can be pushed around by the right team. The collective might of four improving home nations should easily put away Australia.
I think Gatland held back the Lions, and I think Gatland holds back Wales. Gatland has one or two big games a year and everyone seems to forget how, most of the time, his teams are full of talent and are completely underwhelming.
This isn't meant as a dig. I say exactly the same thing about Lancaster.
Schmidt is the only Home Nation head coach that I really rate and should be the next Lions coach. (Rob Baxter would be my second choice.)
Gatland is a good coach and his trophy cabinet over his career would reflect that. However having said that, he has a formulaic gameplan which has been found out, doesn't adapt and evolve to changes, and probably at a time where it's best for Wales to go in a fresh direction now. Gatland's tactics were hugely reliant on a scrum dominance that is no longer there, both his major games in 2013 vs England and Australia coincided with the opposition being pinged off the park. Gatland could still be a decent coach for a Top 14 side perhaps, but it's time to move on at international level.