j'nuh
First XV
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,209
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Yes, this. Biggest disappointment of the tournament for me, Vunipola's scrummaging.It's a fair point that Australia are probably stronger than South Africa at the moment.
It's also a fair point that this really hasn't been a vintage 6N. I'd agree with that whole-heartedly. I'd also say we've had some fairly large dollops of luck at times. I don't care too much - nothing could make me overly excited over 5 games so I look forwards to proving ourselves in the future whatever.
Marler - I thought Marler looked much the same as usual... but was disappointed in Vunipola's scrummaging and feel like he missed out on his big opportunity to overtake. Right now, Marler starting and Vunipola benching feels very much the right call.
p.s. Questions raised about moderation issues will be answered in PMs; not trying to hide anything, but I do want to return discussion here to rugby.
But I'm still no Marler fan. I still would like to see Mullan given a chance.
On the other end of the spectrum, I was very pleasantly surprised by Farrell at 12. I never thought that he was a liability, as was the case of Twelvetrees, Burrell and Barritt, and the attack flowed with him in the line. He's improved at attacking the line too. I would still prefer him at 10 with a specialist at 12, but if there's an injury and Farrell has to play there, or if Farrell is seen to cover 12 during a game, I'm not so worried any more.
That being said, the 12s Lancaster picked would probably be better under new management. I'm not sure how to set aside the biases against these players set up during the Lancaster reign though. Barritt might be better at attacking the line with guidance from Jones, but can we be sure of it? I don't think this question will come up until one of Lancaster's 12s becomes the form 12 in the Premiership, but if they do, I'm not sure how Jones should handle it.