slander and false accusation is still a crime and youre guilty of it here
1) your argument is false. a) the illegal immigration was the real trigger. the labout govt at one stage admitted it was millions. they lost all track of that. IF theyd bothered tracking it and reducing it , instead of calling everyone racist for even mentioning it, we wouldnt be where we are
b) blair yet again , the war criminal. he choose to open borders to nearly every european nation. he had the choice to open to fewer as germany did but he went over the top. End result german population fell over 15/20 years...UK population rose a staggering 9 million in 27 years.. To say a 9 million net increase in population doesnt affect the nation and its services etc is a lie c) By banning the discussion and falsely accusing those of stopping ILLEGAL immigration at the start , then you open the door for frustration and extremists.
2. No idea what youre talking about. We are the UK we should be in control of our own nation and our own laws. Thankfully we kept our currency so we were able to navigate the choppy waters of recessions and chance our interest rates and print money etc Greece and the endless other bankrupt eu nations were powerless to do any of this and are now merely a small irrelevant bankrupt nation controlled by the whims of their richer european partners
3. germany pushed for open borders as they needed mass immigration to push down wages and supply cheap labour
4. the eu destroys sme's and enslaves us ever more to corrupt tax dodging corporate cartels
Riiiiight
1) So Labour admitted the illegal immigration numbered in the millions, I bet you can source that since the home office statistics put it between 300,000 and 500,000 in total. However you notice the key bit, you ADMIT that the problem lay with our government and not the EU. Why the hell do you think that will change with us leaving?
2. You are right, you do have no idea what I'm talking about, that would require you to actually read about the topic, something it is abundantly obvious you have not done. We already are in control. Again, list some EU laws that go directly against what we want as a nation. I assume you also believe Scotland and Wales should separate and the UK should be broken up?
3. Seriously? Are you this stupid? "he choose to open borders to nearly every european nation. he had the choice to
open to fewer as germany did", "germany pushed for open borders as they needed mass immigration to push down wages and supply cheap labour." You can't even keep your damn story straight in the same comment! You are saying for starters Germany opposed greater immigration and their population dropped as a result and then follow up by saying Germany pushed for more immigration to push down wages. Make up your mind, did the Germans want immigration or not?
4. The EU is the only body that has taken on and fined the super businesses of the world like Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft. The EU has stood in front of them when they have tried to weasel around national laws and play divide and conquer forcing countries to offer stupidly favorable tax rates to them to keep them in the country. Where has the UK ever stood up to big business? We bend over and ask them to do us harder.
As I said, it's abundantly obvious that you haven't actually read anything and can't even be consistent in which hyperbolic myth you want to peddle. THIS is why remainers say a large chunk of Brexiters were uninformed and voted purely on emotion, with the emotion largely being fear or hatred.
To add to this you obviously don't know what slander or false accusation are. Let me educate you (AGAIN). Slander is an intentionally false SPOKEN statement about someone intended to damage them in some way. Now you may not be able to read without speaking the words but that would not make it slander, it would be libel. My comments were not about an individual but a large group and nor were they intentionally false as they have been shown to be true so you are also wrong on that account.
As for Trump winning, the last 2 Republican presidents have lost the popular vote but won the presidency. Would you like to sit there again and tell us how the way the majority voted is all that matters and anything but that result is undemocratic?
