Further:
3: Gaddifi's removal from power globally encouraged Nuclear Proliferation
Gaddaffi as head of Libya put a great deal of effort into utilizing the country's oil wealth into developing the country to help the people and positioning Libya as a geopolitical power center to help Africa not suffer as colony exploited by 1st world countries. In turn he supported many revolutions in other countries he thought were good for empowering Africa, and is suspected to have been involved in many terrorist attacks committed against Western Powers. Since Europe needed Libya's oil, and him to secure the North African coastline to prevent migration to Europe, he was mostly allowed to do as he wanted and act out (whereas almost anyone else would have gotten a military intervention or a coup). Amongst other things, he spent some of the oil wealth on developing weapons of mass destruction to protect his country/have power to take other places over. I am not defending Gaddafi, as while he did many positive things, he also did many negative ones. I simply view him as the most fascinating and eccentric dictator in modern history (the guy actually tried to set up a Tent in central park during his UN visit, and then trolled the entire UN in his address).
When George W. Bush became president, declared the global war on terror and invaded Iraq ("over WMDs"), he sent a very strong message to Gaddaffi/scared the living **** out of him. As a result, Gaddaffi took a complete 180, surrendered Libya's entire WMD program and became one of the US's primary partners in sharing intelligence on terrorism and preventing it. Gaddaffi in turn was viewed very favorably by the state department and considered to be a model leader for what US international policy was trying to achieve.....until Hillary ****** that up.
During the presidential primary's of Hillary vs. Obama, Obama (utilizing NLP and stealing the clinton's African American coalition) managed to pull a huge upset win against Hillary (which is most likely why he spoke out about vote fraud during the primaries before denying it could exist later). Hillary in turn was unusually nasty to the Democrat primary challenger, and flung a lot of things against Obama that would normally make you never invite them into your Administration (ie. started the Birther thing). He instead let her in as the Secretary of State (meaning some type of backroom deal and or blackmail happened), and as SoS, Hillary largely operated independently from Obama, often doing things he did not agree with or approve of.
Early in Obama's presidency, a CIA/State Department operation called the Arab spring happened. In it, twitter and facebook were utilized to instigate citizens to mass demonstrate against existing middle eastern regimes and then swap them with US friendly regimes. In some of these countries, jihadis/CIA al-qaida operatives were also sent in to start fermenting violence in the country and require the state military to stop the terrorists, thus creating the impression there was a passionate rebellion/the government was killing citizens/a military intervention was needed to protect the citizen's rights.
Libya was targeted for this regime change process. I personally suspect it was so that Libya would stop guarding the North African coast and unleash a flood of refugees into Europe (this is most consistent with the timing of all other related events, as it matched perfectly with the onset of the Syrian refugee crisis and massive diplomatic pressure to accept all refugees regardless of their source), but many others effectively argue it was because Libya was trying to make a new currency to challenge their/Africa's financial subservience to the US dollar. Others believe that since Libya was vying with Saudi Arabia/The Muslim Brotherhood for geo-political control of the middle east, Huma, on their behalf convinced her to push for the Libya regime change.
Others who witnessed the Libyan situation unfold argued that Hillary was ****** at Gaddaffi for backing Obama instead of her in the Democratic primaries (which Gaddafi did as he strongly believed in African pride).
Once the conflict started ramping up, Gaddafi publicly stated citizens in the country were being murdered by terrorists and he mobilized the army to stop it. The State department in turn escalated the situation, conducted a bombing campaign, the rebel army took Gadaffi out, and he was eventually publicly murdered in the street, at which point Hillary on Camera gloated about it (which is very very unusual for a world leader to do, unless you are a psychopath who acts with impunity ):
Additionally Libya's infrastructure was destroyed making it go from one of the best to worst countries to live in in Africa/the Middle East, uranium munitions were dropped in/on the water supply Gaddafi spent billions developing for the country (named the Great Man Made River), cities of Black Africans were ethnically cleansed by Muslims under Hillary's permission (really, here's a source:
http://theantimedia.org/emails-prov...cting-ethnic-cleansing-supported-them-anyway/ ), and so forth. Basically the place has turned into a fundamentalist muslim **** hole breeding terrorism and sending hordes of people to Europe. ISIS for instance is now retreating to Libya from Syria/Iraq because of how good a job Mattis has done as it's the only stable base of operations they have left.
At the time I had thought this catastrophe was all Obama's fault, and the events in Libya proved Obama didn't give two shits about black people, and anyone who voted for him under those reasons was delusional. However as I dug into it more, I realized it was actually entirely Hillary's doing.
Essentially the following things were going on:
FGaddaffi and Libya's leadership did not want a war or a regime change (presumably for both their sake and that of the country). They were aggressively negotiating for any type of settlement to stop it, including an agreement to completely relinquish power.
Equally, the State Department did not want Gaddafi to be forcibly removed from power, as, as detailed before he had cooperated with the USA, and removing him would harm our interests on many fronts.
Hillary Clinton instead overrode the state department to push for the regime change and dismissed all negotiations of possible peace settlements with Gaddafi. The pushback against this was enough that individuals within the State department established back channels with Libya against her orders to try and prevent the war/regime change from happening.
This is one such source for that claim:
https://www.infowars.com/exclusive-...-over-personal-vendetta-claims-whistleblower/
Many other sources also exist for this claim. Assange for instance refers to Hillary as the "Butcherer of Libya."
Now let's tie this all together.
The primary reason 3rd world countries want nuclear weapons and other WMDs is to protect themselves from a military invasion by a superpower. Gaddafi was promised by the USA that if he stopped WMD production and became compliant, he would be left alone. After the Libyan invasion happened, it sent a very clear message to countries throughout that the USA's word was worthless, and it was in their best interest to undergo nuclear proliferation and flex their muscles. This was one of the state department/department of defense's greatest fears and why many of them opposed Hillary's plan.
North Korea in turn began dramatically more aggressive nuclear posturing following the Libyan invasion, and Trump, Mattis and Tillerson are stuck cleaning up the whole mess, which has escalated to a global security threat for the entire world.....even while the entire media *****es and moans about it being his fault and absolving Hillary of all responsibility.
On the brightside though, Obama and Hillary did their best to make up for this mistake by helping support Iran's nuclear proliferation!"
