- Joined
- Jun 30, 2018
- Messages
- 6,112
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
-
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
A Political Thread pt. 2
- Thread starter ncurd
- Start date
Disgraceful. Nothing more than thugs looking for an excuse to fight and attack innocent people.
What's very worrying is how easy it is to mislead these people by making things up on the internet. It has been for a while, but disinformation is fast becoming one of the biggest issues in modern society.
What's very worrying is how easy it is to mislead these people by making things up on the internet. It has been for a while, but disinformation is fast becoming one of the biggest issues in modern society.
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 8,399
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Thirty-nine police officers injured in Southport unrest
The disorder came just hours after people in Southport held a vigil for Monday's knife attack victims.
www.bbc.co.uk
And Southport
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
What utter twunts
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,020,374
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Hamas' top political leader is killed in Iran in strike that risks triggering all-out regional war
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says that Israel "will exact a heavy price from any aggression against us on any front.”
apnews.com
Iran vows to avenge killing of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh
Ismail Haniyeh, a key figure in ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel, was killed in an overnight air strike in Tehran.
www.bbc.co.uk
Hezbollah's 2nd in command and Hamas' leader within 12hrs is wild - Iran must be raging it happened right under their nose
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,639
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I know the police have issues that need resolving but it seems that attacking and assaulting them has now become fair game. That's Manchester and Southport in the space of week. There were more headlines about police brutality than there were about two thugs thinking it was ok to repeatedly punch two officers (including a female) in the face. Assaulting the police is a massive red line IMO. Justice system needs to be looked at with much more severe punishments for anyone assaulting the police or being involved in these pathetic disinformation fuelled revenge attacks. No surprise that it's being reported that the EDL were involved. Who the **** appointed them to defend the victims' families in this way. Pathetic.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,020,374
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
The video of the EDL twat giving it the biggun to the police then getting hit in the head with a rock, turning around and almost immediately getting hit in the balls with a brick is just
Edit:
Edit:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Had nothing whatsoever to do with defending the victims' families.
I doubt it had anything to do with assaulting the cops either.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
The far right racists were just looking for an opportunity to express their displeasure that their enablers and encouragers lost the election. This was just the first (manufactured) in excuse.
They want to remind everyone that they're there. They need to feel that they're still there in reasonable numbers. They want to create a narrative that Labour / Starmer are responsible (also migrants = bad, of course, whether or not migrants were involved)
They want to remind everyone that they're there. They need to feel that they're still there in reasonable numbers. They want to create a narrative that Labour / Starmer are responsible (also migrants = bad, of course, whether or not migrants were involved)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,639
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
It's all fuelled by disinformation to make it look valid. Of course they were looking for any excuse to cause trouble but I don't see much difference between this and when they claimed they were 'defending the cenotaph' which had no validity either.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Yes, has nothing whatsoever to do with the claimed purpose.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 2,899
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Might be a stupid thing for me to get upset about. It's also reported three police dogs injured by bricks thrown at them.
Yes they can be nasty bitey things when doing there job. But who throws bricks at a dog!!!!
Yes they can be nasty bitey things when doing there job. But who throws bricks at a dog!!!!
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Twunts.
Twunts throw bricks at dogs
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Ha!
A fundraiser for Kamala Harris was held on Twitter (ETA, sorry, it was a youtube fundraiser hosted and promoted by a twitter account). They raised $4M, then Elon closed them down. After tonnes of complaints to Elon personally, he reinstalls the host account
He's such a child
variety.com
A fundraiser for Kamala Harris was held on Twitter (ETA, sorry, it was a youtube fundraiser hosted and promoted by a twitter account). They raised $4M, then Elon closed them down. After tonnes of complaints to Elon personally, he reinstalls the host account
He's such a child
X Suspends, Then Reinstates, ‘White Dudes for Harris’ Account After Group Raises $4 Million for Her Campaign: ‘We Scared Elon Musk’
White Dudes for Harris said Elon Musk's X suspended its account -- then reinstated it -- after it a livestream event raised more than $4 million.
variety.com
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,795
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Is this a case of the law being an ass?
My understanding on this brief statement because Edwards received the images he technically reproduced them and therefore guilty. Even though by the sounds he specifically asked not to receive any and was not informed they were.
My understanding on this brief statement because Edwards received the images he technically reproduced them and therefore guilty. Even though by the sounds he specifically asked not to receive any and was not informed they were.
Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children
The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.
www.bbc.co.uk
I'm confused by reading the article. So if someone sends you illegal images, even if you didn't ask for them or know what they are and you delete them immediately, you are then guilty of making indecent images?Is this a case of the law being an ass?
My understanding on this brief statement because Edwards received the images he technically reproduced them and therefore guilty. Even though by the sounds he specifically asked not to receive any and was not informed they were.
Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children
The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.www.bbc.co.uk
If that's what happened then I don't understand why he's being prosecuted. (maybe I've missed something obvious) Did he not delete them?
Edit: Discussed with my wife who works in the legal field. She suggested that "He did not keep the images" doesn't mean he didn't watch or look at them. Also doesn't give a time frame. Did he delete them immediately, did he keep them for a week, then delete them?
Last edited:
Yeah but its more complex from the article it looks like he asked for reassurances and specifically asked for them not to be illegal.
Like you say he could of destroyed them long after but also if you believe them to be legal why would you?
