In what way does this result demostrate a problem with the competition's format? The deck was stacked very much in favour of the Stormers - they effectively had a week off, were playing at home, had a local ref AND their opposition had to travel from the other side of the planet to play them after a bruising encounter with the mighty Crusaders.
I honestly can't work out how the Stormers got spanked so badly...
We simply have a too small back three. Not necessarily a problem but they aren't your Shane Williams/Cullens' etc.
We are without our regular captain and our injured stand-in captain decided to dross and pull on the red Toulon jersey in the lead up to the game without even letting anyone at the Stormers know beforehand.
The Brumbies played well.
Brumbies kept lying all over the ball on our side particularly at early critical stages this had a huge impact.
The Brumbies targeted the space in behind early with the Stormers' defense weak against this and got the rewards.
The Stormers are seemingly unable to adapt on field.
Schalk Burger pulling out early meant our combined pack ws terribly inexperienced and/or young and this was their first taste of knock out rugby.
Our halves are limited.
Tomane had his best game of the season.
Lleyds had his worst.
Our line-out throwers couln't find their jumpers. This has been a problem all season but it seems it's one we can't fix.
We can't seem to throw anything other than one-off runners at a half-decent defensive line.
This makes for easy gang tackling and jackling.
The ref was uninterested in coming down hard on anything disruptive early on.
Not that it really mattered, the gap in form between the two teams at this stage is just too vast though for my money this is not due to a lack of talent in the Stormers but and inept coaching/backroom staff and a lot of uncertainty/disjointedness in terms of player personel, gameplan and leadership.
The Brumbies were simply a much better side on the day.