Maverick1987
First XV
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,674
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Don't need to, they'll have the game won by the 50th minute
Haha fair call ....
Don't need to, they'll have the game won by the 50th minute
Any advice on what to do when we get lose on saturday? Can't be on with following wendyball, it's really turning into a extreme sport of midget loving and overkill drama these days. Like watching soaps with the mrs. Might take up golf.
Any advice on what to do when we get lose on saturday? Can't be on with following wendyball, it's really turning into a extreme sport of midget loving and overkill drama these days. Like watching soaps with the mrs. Might take up golf.
I agree I'm just saying it's not all over but that's the only scenario where we win and don't go through.
- - - Updated - - -
Also win and defo go out
Aus 2 points England 4
Aus = 11
Eng = 10 + 5 = 15
Wales = 13
Aus 5 Wales 2
aus = 16
Eng = 15
Wales = 15
Still those are extreme examples and if they happen it will be worth a few bob down bookies. Requires Aus to score 4 tries against us and us not to, and Wales to score 4 tries v Aus WHICH WON'T HAPPEN
Im going fishing catching the evening tide on the East coast...but if the updates start showing a good perfomance the pub is just off the beach....
Your point?Have a 2:1 in maths but cba working it out, it's - win the next two games.
Have a 2:1 in maths but cba working it out, it's - win the next two games.
Don't like killing fish, yeah gone soft. Though sounds like a good way to get away from it.
My point was we can win the next two games and still go out. It's fun to work out the scenarios or at least it is for me.You don't need to do the maths.
England but not by a huge amount.
1 jan 2006 to 18 Sep 2015
England record 63/116 54%
Wales record 56/120 47%
It might be worth to note that England have played NZ 4 more time than Wales (8 games to 12), SA 2 more times (13 games to 15) but Wales have played Aus (the weaker out of SH teams and one I'm reluctant to call top 3 size, we have a top 2) 4 more time (15 games to 11).
your reluctant to call a team who came 3rd at the last world cup and who consistantly sits about 3rd in the world rankings not a 'TOP 3'... why? this has always bothered me because it shows an arrogant lack of respect to the australian team (something apparently the english accuse australians of in droves)
Im assuming your reasoning is strongly based around a deep dislike for australian sporting teams, ive heard english often say us aussies(payers and fans) are bad winners but really every nation has bad supporters, to me its more 'tall poppy syndrome' built around australias sporting successes..
in recent years (post rwc2011 to now) Australia have only played england 4 times, all at twickinham and england won 3 and australia 1, but think back to the 2013 AIs game and if it wasnt for some very bad referring decsions it could easily and perhaps should have been a wallabies victory taking the total to 2 wins from 4.
the last two november tests has seen the australian pack decimated by injuries to key players specially in the forwards (moore, pocock to name some), just look at some of the players australia had out in the lions games, lol the last game they were so thread bare george smith was recalled. not even going to mention the off field problems. I would say that 'yes' england have the wood over australia in recent games but i would easily be saying the complete opposite and that australia has the wood over england if some of those were played in australia.
since the end of the last world cup there are only two teams who really 'have the wood over' the wallabies and it just so happens that australia plays against them more so than all other rugby nations, i have never understood how some sections in the NH rugby community will brandish the wallabies as 'not a good team' or see them as 'easy-beats' if they have a poorer than usual RC, which usually means no wins against the AB or Boks. i have noticed in this forum as well as others the wallabies in 2013 and 14 being unfairly labelled and disrepected in media and social media, its odd that the NH teams poor record against the AB and Boks dont get the same criticism. this year australia beat NZ and SA at home, when was the last time which england had done the same?
If the wallabies results in recent times doesnt scream out 'top 3' i duno what. (thats even including the 2 bad years)the only other only side who could possibly is ireland, but even they have not really shown enough outside of their 'home' to change my opinion, perhaps after this world cup and/or a successful tour in the SH will change that.
incorrect.My point was we can win the next two games and still go out. It's fun to work out the scenarios or at least it is for me.
Uh no not at all if you read my previous posts you'll see how.incorrect.
2 wins and were minimum 2nd regardless.
If Australia get an early try I could see this being the Brazil v Germany of the Rugby World Cup.
England have a haunted look around them, and I'm not sure they're psychologically up to it.