Except when it's still in the vicinity of the ruck. Don't understand what's so hard to grasp?!
If you look at where players get away with diving on the ball, it's very rarely right behind the ruck.
You have that law anywhere?
Except when it's still in the vicinity of the ruck. Don't understand what's so hard to grasp?!
If you look at where players get away with diving on the ball, it's very rarely right behind the ruck.
It took me 5 seconds to look up
16.4.e
A player must not fall on or over the ball as it is coming out of a ruck.
Sanction: Penalty kick
http://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=16.4&language=EN
I'm still astonished this law is news to people.
I'm still astonished this law is news to people.
That law above isn't. Bit the ball was already out. Iv seen that allowed by loads of refs.
Can you stop being so patronising please mate, it's highly annoying.
I'm fairly certain you haven't - as I say, if the ball rolls out to the side of a ruck, you're unlikely to get pinged for it.
But if it's directly behind the ruck then you will unless it's gone well clear. It doesn't really happen very often.
The point is that the ball is out - so it's playable. But if it's still in the vicinity of the ruck, you can only play it by picking it up, not diving on it.
It's a bit like taking the ball out of play - you're allowed to take the ball and run it into touch or dead, but you can't throw/pass/strike it out.
I'm not thumbing my nose at you, Wood and Hartley seemed to be unaware of the law, and they're professional players, neither did the commentators apparently.
I'm simply very surprised, because it was drilled into me that you weren't allowed to do it when I was a schoolboy.
What can I say.
I'm wider than the blue lagoon. :mellow:
I reckon Clifford is the new Tom Croft.
I reckon Clifford is the new Tom Croft.
Always hanging about on the wing rather than getting stuck in?