Slightly OT but can anyone explain the penalty given against Wood at 33:44 last week?
I'm generally critical of Wood but not sure I understand this one.
I'm generally critical of Wood but not sure I understand this one.
wales team announcement delayed to 1pm in order to asses North and Biggar's fitness
Slightly OT but can anyone explain the penalty given against Wood at 33:44 last week?
I'm generally critical of Wood but not sure I understand this one.
Fairly happy with that.
Basically you can't dive on the ball whilst it's in the vicinity of the ruck - even if it's out.
I think it's because if you dive on the ball right behind a ruck - it's very difficult to form a new ruck because the old one's in the way.
I've been quite shocked at how few people seem to be aware of the law - I thought it was common knowledge, particularly for back-rowers!
And how to counteract England's Lineup
I'm not sure that's the reason, given a ball carrier can be tackled right on top of the previous ruck, it happens a lot actually... was still surprised it was illegal anyway as players dive on balls squirting out from a ruck a hell of a lot with no penalty
Happy enough with the side
Surprised at Nowell coming in for May, I'd have expected Daly to be the one to drop out.
Wonder what this means for Watson? Fullback?
They're only allowed to do it if the ball isn't near the ruck, if it goes out to the side, it's not so much of a problem.
You also can't really do much to prevent players being tackled onto an existing ruck - if you could, they probably would.
Problem is the referees explanation of the penalty was "The Balls out but you can't dive on it, you must stay on your feet". Bearing in mind that this happens very frequently with players often diving on the lose ball and not penalised for it, his explanation doesn't really help much. The ball seemed to end up with enough space from the previous ruck as well.
If the balls out and it's open play then you can dive on it. Don't understand this one.