My only issue with bringing Tips straight in would be physicality. As Dull mentioned above: Gatland doesn't like using Tipuric, and us being outmuscled last week won't make him turn to a smaller player.
I think any other coach would play him, though.
Tipuric coming off the bench at 60, against tireder defences and weak shoulders would be excellent.
I don't necessarily think physicality was the big issue. POM and SOB are both physical guys, as was our second row pairing. However it lacked pace, meaning they couldn't get in position to use their physicality, and that just gave NZ pretty much uncontested ruck ball in attack.
The pace of NZ's phase play was relentless at times, and you could see it really taking its toll, especially on AWJ who was really struggling with the pace NZ were playing at.
So imo, we need to look at how we can get some more mobility into that Lions pack. Changing the second rows is a obvious place to start imo, especially with Lawes, Itoje and Henderson in playing so well. The other place is to tinker with the back-row who were far from their best on Sat. The options there would be Warbs (not been playing well), Stander, Tips, or shifting Henderson or Lawes to 6. I've said previously that I'd go for a Stander, Tips, Faletau backrow, that for me is a well balanced backrow with 2 flankers who bring clear unique strengths + the all-rounder in Faletau.
For me POM, SOB, Warburton and even Faletau are all a little too similar. They are all good all-round players, who do lots of things well, but maybe lack real outstanding facets to their game (SOB used to possess crazy carrying ability, but I haven't seen that for a long time tbh). I just don't see how it's a very balanced unit at all. They all deserved their positions for the first test, but a coach needs to look beyond who the individual standouts are and consider the combination, for me Gats failed to do that throughout the side:
- The second-row pairing was ill-balanced, with both Kruis and AWJ similar types of players (plus AWJ looking behind the pace).
- As I've said, the backrow was imo not very well balanced.
- The midfield from 9-13 lacked balance as well. Murray and Sexton complement each other, I don't think Murray and Farrell do. Te'o and Davies have been the stand-out centers, but again the balance there is poor imo.
- Even the back three maybe lacked balance. You've got 3 versatile players, who have very much been considered utility players thus far in their careers. It might have been better to select someone like North who would have offered something different with his power.
Some of this is obviously easier to say with hindsight. At the time I thought it was a decent selection, although would have had Lawes/Itoje in the starting 15.