From rugbymag.com
Source: http://www.rugbymag.com/usa-men/4439-usa-looking-at-new-international-comp.html
I like the idea of this, it gets more test matches in a competitive tournament format against teams of similar quality. It will allow these nations to not only build a team with players they have but also allow them to blood new caps to see how they fare in test rugby. My worry (and everyone else's) is that the format will be too demanding on these teams. Even New Zealand I think would be crazy to play a test match every 4 days.
I think that a 6 team round robin (5 games) is more than great and that they should just toss out the semi final and final. I understand they may want to eliminate the 'upset' win and give them a second chance to win it, and that they may want to simulate 'World Cup conditions' slightly by having a pressure situation such as knockout stages, but that's what I love about a league championship. Imagine the 6 Nations have a semi and final? I think it says something if a team can go unbeaten the whole way.
The other format brought up by others is basically the old Churchill Cup format of 2 pools of 3 and then ranking matches. It would allow teams to play all matches in time with proper rest. Whether they'd do a host nation like with the Churchill Cup, or only have a host for the final 3 ranking matches that would have to be worked out. It's ok, better than what we have now but this would be my second choice.
What do people here think, especially some of our Canadian members? Would love to hear your thoughts on this!
WRITTEN BY ALEX GOFF SATURDAY, 05 MAY 2012 13:56
USA Rugby CEO Nigel Melville posted on his blog comments that he thinks the USA is close to joining a new Pacific Nations Cup men's international competition starting in 2013.
Melville was in talks with Japan, Canada, Samoa, Tonga, and Fiji to revisit the format of the old Epson Cup, which ran from 1999-2001 (before that, there was the Pacific Rim, 1996-1998 which has Japan, Canada, USA and Hong Kong).
The talks have been going on for over a year and Melville said the framework has now been agreed to (at least preliminarily) to develop an intense six-team competition during the June test window.
Said Melville:
"Discussions between the Tier 2′s and Tier 1′s resulted in a limited (but very welcome) inbound Tier 1 schedule for Canada and the USA each June and games against Tier 1′s for the Islands during November in Europe. The impact being that we will host Italy (2012 buy your tickets now), Ireland (2013) and Scotland (2014) in June. Of course, that's great but we need more fixtures and friendlies don't cut it with our fans, we want meaningful games."
So the plan appears to be six teams playing 33 games, meaning all six teams play each other once, with the top four going into a semifinal-final format.
That would mean you needed to squeeze five weeks of matches, and a weekend of semis and finals, into about four weeks. To do that, you'd need to play every four days through most of June. That's enormously demanding, but it's possible.
Added Melville in his post:
"Next steps, the schedule is being double checked, the logistics folk are putting together a plan and the financial team working out the costs. We have developed a commercial program for ***le Sponsors and Broadcasters, and the final step will be approval from the IRB Council/Executive."
Source: http://www.rugbymag.com/usa-men/4439-usa-looking-at-new-international-comp.html
I like the idea of this, it gets more test matches in a competitive tournament format against teams of similar quality. It will allow these nations to not only build a team with players they have but also allow them to blood new caps to see how they fare in test rugby. My worry (and everyone else's) is that the format will be too demanding on these teams. Even New Zealand I think would be crazy to play a test match every 4 days.
I think that a 6 team round robin (5 games) is more than great and that they should just toss out the semi final and final. I understand they may want to eliminate the 'upset' win and give them a second chance to win it, and that they may want to simulate 'World Cup conditions' slightly by having a pressure situation such as knockout stages, but that's what I love about a league championship. Imagine the 6 Nations have a semi and final? I think it says something if a team can go unbeaten the whole way.
The other format brought up by others is basically the old Churchill Cup format of 2 pools of 3 and then ranking matches. It would allow teams to play all matches in time with proper rest. Whether they'd do a host nation like with the Churchill Cup, or only have a host for the final 3 ranking matches that would have to be worked out. It's ok, better than what we have now but this would be my second choice.
What do people here think, especially some of our Canadian members? Would love to hear your thoughts on this!