Yeah indeed to have specific numbers to give cards would go a long way to negating the inconsistencies, there may then be a reluctance to issue pens when they stack up preventing cards who knows. I hear you but if NZ set the stall out like they did go for goal every time rather than go for the corner prevent any real momentum gain and only concede 3 when 7 could very easily happen seems like a cynical way to win a game, had the 50/22 of lowes resulted in a trie it's a few point game with not long left, if Ireland take the lead, and go on to win it, you could in the analysis say we brought far to much pressure on ourselves conceeding those pens, you'd call could also say had we not we could have conceded some tries and potentially cards which would have a real chance to slant the score board further in NZ favour. It's all very hypothetical but I think what is clear is there really is very little to pick from top 3 or 4, being slightly off the boil will more often than not result in a loss, other than a small amount of revenge for the WC exit and defending the fortress the game was pretty meaningless (as far as that goes in the sport), NZ don't hold the same challenge to Ireland as they once did it's easy to see why they wouldn't be able to get the the right place for this one compared to ones of the recent past.I agree on the yellow card, we should have seen one. I think world rugby needs to cone up with a defined system for team yellow cards. 8 pens = yellow and redzone pens count for double or something like that.
Don't think we adapted at all well though. 13 penalties is a pretty shocking return considering only one was for holding on. Not controlling the controllables.