• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Third Test: Australia v British and Irish Lions (06/07/13)

Let us live in hypothetical land for a while. Lancaster has been coach, he named a squad which has almost 50% English players with Robshaw captain. Every single one of them gets test time and after Robshaw is injured he chooses another English player as captain. The final, most important test is picked with 10 English players. Would you be happy? Would you be telling all your Welsh friends to cut Lancaster some slack?


its not a problem (for me anyway) what nationality the players are, my problem is that Gatland. His histroy and sides play one way, and its restrictive. Lancaster at least would of played a more expansive rugby game as he has the players at his disposal who are world class. He tried to but problem he has that we don't have a BOD in the middle and the only nearest player to it is Billy Twtrees, croft came STRAIGHT back and we played croft as a winger/back and defender doubling up on the opposing winger. Unfortunately Lancaster is still learning and unproven but i have no doubt the Lions side would of played differently with him/schmidt/kidney/robinson/geech. At least Lancaster admits that to win games the direct approach can only get you so far. You need the creativity/guile of players to score trys. Gatland unfortunately sticks to his power game philosphy and he insists it works -but stats against teams who are creative/play ball in hand (aussies) show they beat that game plan time and time again.

RE: Robshaw, he got crucified for the wales vs england game, gatland ignored all he done in the season. Would it of been bad to have him in the side? i think it would of been ok. He is a bloody good back-row player. but if ferris was fit he would of played ahead of lydiate etc. But with gatland i am not sure he would of.
 
Last edited:
But I'll ask so on certain issues.

a) When they trained in Ireland why bring Welsh U.20 players to make up numbers? Why not Irish U.20s or even Munster/Leinster/Ulster lads not on duty. And when in Wales and short players why use Wales U.20 full squad why not just call in extra players from standby list? There were lots that werent with National teams until following week or 2. Players off top of my head in Munster - Zebo, O'Mahony, Mike Sherry, Kilcoyne and James Downey. (All internationals) Add in likes of Robshaw, Ashton etc all these lads better than Wales U.20's so why was Welsh teams used heavily?

b) Bowe and Cuthbert were never in same class as defensively Cuthbert (isn't versatile for bench) is poor so that was never close. Same with Tipuric wasn't on form really so SOB was always ahead and Tipuric would only have been in ahead of Lydiate.

c) The issue of Phillips over the first 2 tests Phillips has been by a large distance the worst of the 3 9's so why select him? Murray had excellent game when on last week and Youngs wasn't as bad in his appearances so what is the reasoning behind Phillips suddenly been parachuted back in as a starter.

d) Youngs has outshone Hibbard in darts and argubally around field so why sacrifice our lineout for scrum.

e) Regards BOD I'd have no problem in BOD been dropped if it was based fairly on form and on form Tuilagi is the man deserving a 13 shirt ahead of BOD but nobody else.

f) Warburton was handed the captaincy when he wasn't even guaranteed his Welsh jersey.

g) Gatland picked all Welsh coaches with Farrell who is a yes man and Rowntree who also just is a puppet for Gatland. I've respect for Rob Howley but the Lions is about entertaining rugby and Joe Schmidt openly revealed he'd love the Backs/Attack role for Lions and Gatland didn't even consider him. Now as a Munster man it's not easy to say but how can you overlook a man who is 1 of the best in World Rugby - I'll tell you why because Gatland was worried he might get credit and the All Blacks might be shown his talent and he's a threat.

h) You mention subconsiousness but I'll ask question so - IF it's all about Combinations and that reason Davies was retained then why isn't Murray at 9 as he's showed better than Phillips but more so on same reasoning as Davies him and Sexton are national partners?
Same could be argued for Heaslip beside SOB? I don't think it subconsiousness when it basically said.

i) And finally my point why so many changes like we haven't been hammered but I would question is it a coincidence that every Welsh player except Evans will see test duty and if you add in had Gethin Jenkins been fit and Priestland they would've too.

Maybe all coincidence but

a) I believe an U20 player was only used as a tackle bag holder during the time the Lions were training in Wales. Similarly, they trained with/against the Welsh squad while they were at the same training base in Glanmorgan. Hardly the end of the world tbh. This has been made into some huge deal, when it really, really isn't. If he wanted to somehow use the Lions in order to develop a young prop, Rob Evans wouldn't be the obvious choice!

b) Much too much is made of Cuthberts poor defence. He get's caught out about as often as Kearney does at fullback, and with similar consequences. Cuthbert's try scoring has been second to none in the NH during his international career. Still nothing wrong with Bowe starting, he's a world class player.

c) I agree to some extent. Murray has been the form 9 this tour. Picking Phillips is all about gambling that he'll have one of his big games, the type of game where he controls everything and scores a ridiculous try in the corner. Double standards here certainly, as BOD hasn't been offered the same pass.

d) Youngs' lineout throwing wasn't great last week. It's also evident that he's incapable of throwing to the tail, hence Croft standing at the front of the lineout in the first test. Hibbard has been below his best, but I don't think he'll weaken the lineout, whereas he'll strengthen the scrum and offer something the little different with his brute strength. Always was a 50/50 call for this test imo.

e) Yeah I agree, although looking at combinations things start to get a little cloudy.

f) I think everyone should stop going on about Warburton being the captain. He was magnificent last week, and fully justified his inclusion in the team and as captain. Things unravelled when he went off.

g) I have issues with the coaches as well, but not because he picked Howley and Jenkins. Jenkins has earned his place, the kickers on tour have been magnificent. I would have picked Schmidt as well. But Gatland did leave behind his long time college Shaun Edwards, and wrongly so imo. Still, difficult to claim he just picked Welsh coaches, when he left such an important one out.

h) Faletau fully deserves to start ahead of Heaslip. It would have been a bigger travesty imo if Faletau missed out on a test than BOD being dropped, because Faletau has genuinely played well in just about every game he's played.

i) Starting to wish he hadn't picked as many Welshmen, as the resentment is almost deafening. Many of the Welsh players deserve their positions. Lydiate, Phillips and Davies are the three that possibly don't. There's been far worse calls on previous Lions tours tbh. Still, I can understand the hostility, but all of those players will give their 100%, and I hope they can win. Just think of Halfpenny..... he was so upset after the last test, do you really want to see him like that again. :cryy:
 
Last edited:
its not a problem (for me anyway) what nationality the players are, my problem is that Gatland. His histroy and sides play one way, and its restrictive. Lancaster at least would of played a more expansive rugby game as he has the players at his disposal who are world class. He tried to but problem he has that we don't have a BOD in the middle and the only nearest player to it is Billy Twtrees, croft came STRAIGHT back and we played croft as a dummy winger and defender doubling up on the opposing winger. Unfortunately Lancaster is still learning and unproven but i have no doubt the side would of played differently with him. At least Lancaster admits that to win games the direct approach can only get you so far. You need the creativity/guile of players to score trys. Gatland unfortunately sticks to his power game philosphy and he insists it works -but stats against teams who are creative/play ball in hand (aussies) show they beat the Wales time and time again.

If I believed Wales had the players who deserved to take ten spots of the test team neither would I.
 
It has been pretty clear to me since the squad was announced and Warburton named captain. Sure I see things from an England perspective as you see things from a Welsh. Personally, based on this last year prior to the Lions squad neither Cuthbert nor Tipuric would have been in my squad. I will just add that Launchbury and Morgan have both been absolutely outstanding for England this previous year and I thought it was a poor decision to leave them both out, amongst others.

As for your points:-
When Hibbard came on in the first test the scrum went to ****. Tom Youngs should be the number one hooker, that is pretty clear to most. If anyone I think it was Jones whos test spot should have been up for grabs as he had a poor game around the park last weekend. I will point out I don't mind Jones keeping his spot though, they want to hurt the Aussie scrum.
By coping with the physicality do you mean running into Mowen's loving arms again and again? Murray or Youngs had to start with the other benched. Hooper isn't playing btw.
In the back row I don't think Lydiate should be there, but I have no problem with Faletau getting in. Obviously as I said before Morgan would be the guy I wanted at 8 but that is not to be.
Centre is my main issue. It isn't fine that he slaps in the face one of the greatest Lions I ever had the pleasure of watching. On form he is much better than Davies too, I agree he hasn't been at his best but Davies has been much worse. It is a good thing for him that we won that first test or his final mistake might have put him in O'Garaland. As for who comes in, how in the hell has Roberts found himself in front of Tuilagi? He can crashball at least as good as Roberts (which is all he has) and he can do so much more. BOD (47 in 125) and Manu (10 in 21) also score tries consistently and create for others. Davies (9 in 36) and Roberts (5 in 53) do not. BOD may well not be as good as he was, but he is still better than both the guys who are starting.
As for Halfpenny, he has not been player of the tour. His goalkicking has been a thing of beauty but if for example AWJ was kicking at goal immaculately I still wouldn't factor it in to who I picked at lock. It is just a bonus. Halfpenny has been solid, nothing more, as fullback. George North is the guy I pick for that accolade.

Let us live in hypothetical land for a while. Lancaster has been coach, he named a squad which has almost 50% English players with Robshaw captain. Every single one of them gets test time and after Robshaw is injured he chooses another English player as captain. The final, most important test is picked with 10 English players. Would you be happy? Would you be telling all your Welsh friends to cut Lancaster some slack?

To say Tuilagi is better than Roberts is laughable , I stopped reading after the bit in bold lol ! Tuilagi I think will come good but..... And I know I keep saying this " isn't Tuilagi an Outside Centre ? "
 
Tuilagi for me doesn't have the ball/handling skills intelligence or game management of BOD/JD or Roberts (yet). Fortunately for him gatland likes his crash-bang-whallop style -as that doesn't need much intelligence just muscle:p the other centre can do the thinking for clever lines etc
 
To say Tuilagi is better than Roberts is laughable , I stopped reading after the bit in bold lol ! Tuilagi I think will come good but..... And I know I keep saying this " isn't Tuilagi an Outside Centre ? "
He doesn't need to "come good" he's been on better form than Roberts for years.
Roberts is still dining out on 2009 Lions.

Davies is being played out of position as well - can't remember if he prefers 12 or 13 (think his twitter says 12) but either way he's playing half his games out of position.


edit: I'm not saying Roberts is a poor player, he's just nowhere near the level he was in '09. Still a great player, but I'd pick Tuilagi ahead of him based on form and fitness at the moment.
 
Last edited:
I think if you asked any opposition coach who they would rather face, Roberts or Tuilagi, it would be unanimous.
 
If Gatland really was being biased or showing favouritism, why wouldn't he have picked this 23 for the very first test? Why now? He must have his reasons, he is a tried and tested international coach.

I just find it bemusing how people can start accusing a coach of showing favouritism at this late stage. Only a couple of changes have been made to the starting XV (one of them forced by injury), and nobody was really complaining about the 23 before the first test. To have yourself believe you know what Gatland's motives are is naive and absurd.

If Gatland was showing favouritism, surely he would have taken Shaun Edwards as a defensive coach from the Welsh set-up? Edwards has coached Wales into a fantastic defensive team.

But, as SelimNiai said, us Welsh posters will get labelled with the same "biased" tag for trying to defend the New Zealand born head coach of the Lions, purely for the fact he has dropped the untouchable Brian O'Driscoll. He was a fantastic player and has played his part this tour, but he is just a human being too. Players shouldn't have a god-given right to a test place just because of their name, which is what a lot of people seem to think on here.

Few of us are actually suggesting that Gatland was knowingly, self-consciously, deliberately biased - most of us I think, such as Feicarsinn, Peat and myself are complaining because the obviously welsh coloration of the lions touring party and match squads was an emminently predictable consequence of electing another national coach to head up the lions. As has been outlined numerous times, people voiced concerns at many different stages; when Gatland was chosen, when the squad was announced, the captain was chosen, when Warbs was kept there despite injury for the first few weeks... and now. Its not favouritism of the sort you're alleging - it's calls such as Lydiate over Robshaw, Jenkins over Corbisiero, Sheridan, Grant in selection.... then within the tour itself, the fact that Lydiate has steadfastly held his place in the match 23, where Heaslip and Croft have been dropped despite playing pretty well on the whole. Its philips' inevitable and automatic selection at 9, despite playing like horse****...its Jamie Roberts coming straight back into the side despite being the poorest of the four centres on tour.. for most of us, the Davies/O Driscoll thing is little more than the final nail in a pretty well nailed coffin... and you really do overly reduce our arguments by making out that this is our only issue.

At the same time, I wouldn't suggest for a moment that Gatland is deliberately biased - but you could argue he could have tried harder to operate with a blank slate, and done a better job of picking on genuine merit.

The second main thing we're bemoaning is that when you come round to a lions tour, you want to see a new blend of tactics which plays to the strengths and attributes of all the players. What we are seeing, in my opinion, is entirely Welsh tactics in the same colour shirts, but with a few fillers in key positions, from the other nations. The decision to name Davies and Roberts together whilst dropping Drico is about more than just the face value selection. Think of it this way: if the only thing that mattered was playing the most coherent, tightest side, than the most sensible thing to do in any lions tour would be to just pick a 15 composed of entirely one country - Ireland in 2009 may very well have done better than the Lions did! The 2008 Wales side was basically just the Ospreys, and I believe that helped them.. But when you add the issue of selection on merit, and the lions spirit, its clear that you can't do that - for me, combining Davies and Roberts in midfield for 'one last bash(literally)' at the Aussies just represents a complete waste of the combined talents of the isles, and amounts to importing the Wales game plan piece for piece. It's just a crying shame. The Hibbard over Youngs thing is perfectly palatable from the point of view of scrummaging, but for me its yet another signal of a boring gameplan which is unadventurous and a waste of the lions opportunity.

For the record, I don't agree at all with those saying we're definitely going to lose...we might very well win...but I can tell you there would be no humble pie from me if we do win, as on principle I still disagree with what's happened.
 
I think if you asked any opposition coach who they would rather face, Roberts or Tuilagi, it would be unanimous.

I don't mate ! The last meaningful game I seem Tuilagi play in was the Wales v England 6n winner takes all FINALE ! And all I remember is Tuilagi messed up TWO good England chances and for the rest of the game.....

As I said I think he is going to be one hell of a player and I am looking forward to seeing him come on later in the game !
 
Wales have only lost by more than 8 once under Gatland back in 2009, they have never got "tanked". In 2012, in November, there was a team with players like Liam Williams, Priestland, Scott Andrews and Lou Reed starting (players who went and got outplayed by Japan), and they still only lost in the last minute. So how is a team with good Wales players with good Irish and English going to get tanked? Only that is happening is if the squad has bad attitude in the mind.

Well - consider the team for Sat:
- We are playing one of the world's best 6s as a 7 against one of the greatest 7s ever because of a fixation with another 6 who can only tackle (albeit well). Further to that, we have dropped our hooker and centre who are renowned breakdown operators in their own right. We will lose the breakdown and we will lose it badly.
- Our inside centre is in terrible form and carrying a dodgy hamstring.
- Our outside centre for this weekend had a marginally better than 50% tackle success rate last weekend and got badly caught in a ~12.5 channel for the Aussie try last weekend.
- Our scrum half is a lazy bast*rd who won't do a job covering the back door of the centres (then blame it on a knee injury).

O'Connor, Leali'ifano and AAC are going to have plenty of quick ball and space to work in. If JD loses his man despite being told exactly where to go - what chance is there of him organising the defense properly?

The Aussies are gonna rip us a new one through their midfield. Quick ball + guile = trouble.
 
If Gatland really was being biased or showing favouritism, why wouldn't he have picked this 23 for the very first test? Why now? He must have his reasons, he is a tried and tested international coach.

Pretty simple - the man is under a lot of pressure and is reverting to what he knows.
 
I don't mate ! The last meaningful game I seem Tuilagi play in was the Wales v England 6n winner takes all FINALE ! And all I remember is Tuilagi messed up TWO good England chances and for the rest of the game.....

As I said I think he is going to be one hell of a player and I am looking forward to seeing him come on later in the game !
Must've missed him scoring a try in the premiership final then...

Can't just pick and choose specific games to base your impressions of players on, otherwise we'd all be harping on about how it should be Barritt/Tuilagi in the midfield after they're tore NZ apart together.
 
Few of us are actually suggesting that Gatland was knowingly, self-consciously, deliberately biased - most of us I think, such as Feicarsinn, Peat and myself are complaining because the obviously welsh coloration of the lions touring party and match squads was an emminently predictable consequence of electing another national coach to head up the lions.

Tbh, the main thing I care about is that I look at the selection and I don't think we're going to win.

That's my beef.
 
Henry, think of it this way. Us Welsh have had to deal with Gatland's one dimensional tactics for 6 years, now the rest of you get to know how we feel. :D In the end though, success sure does help matters, so if we win I'm sure you'll be celebrating with the rest of us.

We all knew what sort of game plan we were going to get with Gatland as head coach. Maybe we need to blame the Lions hierarchy for selecting Gatland in the first place. I would have been much happier as a Welsh fan if Gatland hadn't have been selected.
 
Last edited:
Few of us are actually suggesting that Gatland was knowingly, self-consciously, deliberately biased - most of us I think, such as Feicarsinn, Peat and myself are complaining because the obviously welsh coloration of the lions touring party and match squads was an emminently predictable consequence of electing another national coach to head up the lions. As has been outlined numerous times, people voiced concerns at many different stages; when Gatland was chosen, when the squad was announced, the captain was chosen, when Warbs was kept there despite injury for the first few weeks... and now. Its not favouritism of the sort you're alleging - it's calls such as Lydiate over Robshaw, Jenkins over Corbisiero, Sheridan, Grant in selection.... then within the tour itself, the fact that Lydiate has steadfastly held his place in the match 23, where Heaslip and Croft have been dropped despite playing pretty well on the whole. Its philips' inevitable and automatic selection at 9, despite playing like horse****...its Jamie Roberts coming straight back into the side despite being the poorest of the four centres on tour.. for most of us, the Davies/O Driscoll thing is little more than the final nail in a pretty well nailed coffin... and you really do overly reduce our arguments by making out that this is our only issue.

At the same time, I wouldn't suggest for a moment that Gatland is deliberately biased - but you could argue he could have tried harder to operate with a blank slate, and done a better job of picking on genuine merit.

The second main thing we're bemoaning is that when you come round to a lions tour, you want to see a new blend of tactics which plays to the strengths and attributes of all the players. What we are seeing, in my opinion, is entirely Welsh tactics in the same colour shirts, but with a few fillers in key positions, from the other nations. The decision to name Davies and Roberts together whilst dropping Drico is about more than just the face value selection. Think of it this way: if the only thing that mattered was playing the most coherent, tightest side, than the most sensible thing to do in any lions tour would be to just pick a 15 composed of entirely one country - Ireland in 2009 may very well have done better than the Lions did! The 2008 Wales side was basically just the Ospreys, and I believe that helped them.. But when you add the issue of selection on merit, and the lions spirit, its clear that you can't do that - for me, combining Davies and Roberts in midfield for 'one last bash(literally)' at the Aussies just represents a complete waste of the combined talents of the isles, and amounts to importing the Wales game plan piece for piece. It's just a crying shame. The Hibbard over Youngs thing is perfectly palatable from the point of view of scrummaging, but for me its yet another signal of a boring gameplan which is unadventurous and a waste of the lions opportunity.

For the record, I don't agree at all with those saying we're definitely going to lose...we might very well win...but I can tell you there would be no humble pie from me if we do win, as on principle I still disagree with what's happened.

Well that is the problem with Lions Tours ! Fans and "experts" are going to be slightly biased towards their own nations players and I understand that but its going to get to a point where you pick a coaching staff with no ties or you politically have to even out the 22 with the four nations players ???? I think it's already too political hence no Shaun Edwards ?

Everyone has opinions which is great for example I think Phillips is the best 9 and others think he's not same goes for Robshaw I don't rate him and u seen what happened when he didn't get picked ? If there was an English/Irish or Scottish man in charge and he picked the same team Gats has do u think there would be so much controversy ????

I don't buy into any of this Gatland has picked on what he's comfortable with either cause as I said he's far to good and experienced for that ?

The only time I have ever thought a Lions coach was picking on past form or favouritism was Clive Woodward's 2005 first test ! Apart from that I think the coaching staff have picked what they believe to be the best side ? Don't forget Gats hasn't coached Wales for a while cause he's been scouting for the Lions and he's seen all the players in training for a while now so..... And do we know for s fact Tuilagi is 100% ?
 
Must've missed him scoring a try in the premiership final then...

Can't just pick and choose specific games to base your impressions of players on, otherwise we'd all be harping on about how it should be Barritt/Tuilagi in the midfield after they're tore NZ apart together.

I don't watch the GP mate ! And GP final vs 6n decider bit of a difference in game magnitude ?
 
a) I believe an U20 player was only used as a tackle bag holder during the time the Lions were training in Wales. Similarly, they trained with/against the Welsh squad while they were at the same training base in Glanmorgan. Hardly the end of the world tbh. This has been made into some huge deal, when it really, really isn't. If he wanted to somehow use the Lions in order to develop a young prop, Rob Evans wouldn't be the obvious choice!

b) Much too much is made of Cuthberts poor defence. He get's caught out about as often as Kearney does at fullback, and with similar consequences. Cuthbert's try scoring has been second to none in the NH during his international career. Still nothing wrong with Bowe starting, he's a world class player.

c) I agree to some extent. Murray has been the form 9 this tour. Picking Phillips is all about gambling that he'll have one of his big games, the type of game where he controls everything and scores a ridiculous try in the corner. Double standards here certainly, as BOD hasn't been offered the same pass.

d) Youngs' lineout throwing wasn't great last week. It's also evident that he's incapable of throwing to the tail, hence Croft standing at the front of the lineout in the first test. Hibbard has been below his best, but I don't think he'll weaken the lineout, whereas he'll strengthen the scrum and offer something the little different with his brute strength. Always was a 50/50 call for this test imo.

e) Yeah I agree, although looking at combinations things start to get a little cloudy.

f) I think everyone should stop going on about Warburton being the captain. He was magnificent last week, and fully justified his inclusion in the team and as captain. Things unravelled when he went off.

g) I have issues with the coaches as well, but not because he picked Howley and Jenkins. Jenkins has earned his place, the kickers on tour have been magnificent. I would have picked Schmidt as well. But Gatland did leave behind his long time college Shaun Edwards, and wrongly so imo. Still, difficult to claim he just picked Welsh coaches, when he left such an important one out.

h) Faletau fully deserves to start ahead of Heaslip. It would have been a bigger travesty imo if Faletau missed out on a test than BOD being dropped, because Faletau has genuinely played well in just about every game he's played.

i) Starting to wish he hadn't picked as many Welshmen, as the resentment is almost deafening. Many of the Welsh players deserve their positions. Lydiate, Phillips and Davies are the three that possibly don't. There's been far worse calls on previous Lions tours tbh. Still, I can understand the hostility, but all of those players will give their 100%, and I hope they can win. Just think of Halfpenny..... he was so upset after the last test, do you really want to see him like that again. :cryy:
Well look I suppose you've made fair points there and that is fair just think some calls as you say are 50/50 and I see it 1 way while you see another side both I suppose with valid points.

@Duck yes I got mixed regards yellow cards and meant the records in terms of win % DK is better.
 
I don't mate ! The last meaningful game I seem Tuilagi play in was the Wales v England 6n winner takes all FINALE ! And all I remember is Tuilagi messed up TWO good England chances and for the rest of the game.....

As I said I think he is going to be one hell of a player and I am looking forward to seeing him come on later in the game !

Please open your other eye... I'm sick of hearing this talk of 'maybe eventually he'll be better than Roberts...' as if Tuilagi is still a child and Roberts has maintained the form of four years ago. It's true that England don't get the best out of Tuilagi, and if you think all he serves up in a white shirt is all he's capable of, it's clear you don't watch much aviva. But even just taking England, he's dragged a boring and uninspiring England backline kicking and screaming to a couple of good wins in the last few years against some strong opposition, and hehas an excellent strikerate... people don't credit it enough, but Tuilagi is also a very intelligent player with a great understanding of the game. Naturally people don't see that because, to be fair, in interviews he he appears as thick as two short planks.


Henry, think of it this way. Us Welsh have had to deal with Gatland's one dimensional tactics for 6 years, now the rest of you get to know how we feel. :D In the end though, success sure does help matters, so if we win I'm sure you'll be celebrating with the rest of us.

We all knew what sort of game plan we were going to get with Gatland as head coach. Maybe we need to blame the Lions hierarchy for selecting Gatland in the first place. I would have been much happier as a Welsh fan if Gatland hadn't have been selected.

I certainly will be celebrating with you, no doubts at all about that. But I'll still be grumpy, and aged about 10 years in the process of watching what's unlikely to be a pretty game! :p
 
Last edited:
Well look I suppose you've made fair points there and that is fair just think some calls as you say are 50/50 and I see it 1 way while you see another side both I suppose with valid points.

@Duck yes I got mixed regards yellow cards and meant the records in terms of win % DK is better.

Which is still incorrect. Gatland is still better marginally. Eddie O'Sullivan better than both, but also crashed at 2 RWC's and never won a 6N ***le.
 
In a, probably futile, attempt to change the mood

<img style="-webkit-user-select: none; cursor: -webkit-zoom-in;" src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1016173_10152056026248709_178519770_n.jpg" width="324" height="544">
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top