Amobokoboko
Waikato Junglist
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
- Messages
- 4,724
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
10 minutes to go and the Crusaders trail by 1
Good tactical game by sharks.
If you call tactics paying off the ref.
and my WOW, Crusaders blown up for collapsing, Shark penalty and they learned from the Bulls and kick out
SHARKS VICTORY!!!!!!!
Fourth only victory over the Crusaders, first since 2007
Well done lads
P.S. thanks draggs, you made me work tonight and thus I am still sober![]()
Gutted that Crusaders lost this game, because they were the better team all over the park; running metres, possession, territory, clean breaks, offloads, rucks & mauls all favoured them.
It didn't help to have a "Hometown Harry" performance from referee Lourens van der Merwe, who is IMO, not up to scratch at this level. He missed a LOT of defensive offsides from the Sharks rush defence. Fourteen shots at goal in 80 minutes (one every 5½ minutes) tells me that the referee is refereeing "to the book" without placing enough emphasis on materiality; a sure sign of inexperience at this level. Some of his calls appeared to be out of his own Law book.
[rant]
The sooner we lose this BS of not having neutral referees in Super Rugby, the better.
There are now six referees from NZ, six from SA and five from Australia (plus one from Argentina) so there are no more excuses for not having a neutral referees in every match.
[/rant]
I think blaming the ref is a little far fetched. He was awful, as he usually is but it really went both ways. Clearly he doesn't understand the rules when it comes to the scrum, since he hardly penalized any infringements by either team.
The Sharks won, purely because they had more gas in the tank at the end. I will take the 4 points despite not scoring a try.