- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 11,758
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Though I'm certainly no expert on English rugby, I wouldn't be a fan of putting Tuilagi on the wing either. How much experience has he got on the wing? His pace wouldn't be a concern for me, but his 'non-running basics' would be a major concern: Is he familiar with the defensive responsibilities of a wing? Is he strong under the high ball? Does he have a kicking game? South Africa are experts are targeting opposition wingers with their kicking game - any inexperience/weakness in opposition wingers will usually be exploited. Though I can certainly see the attraction of having Tuilagi on the wing, I think a test match versus South Africa is the last place you would want to experiment!
Totally agree with this!
What I can't understand is why all these talks about getting proper wings, when your wings never got the ball??? Yes Tuilagi was one of the reasons they never got the ball as everytime he got it, he tried to run through the entire bok team with very little success. England's problem was distribution, and this was due to the following reasons:
1. Englands scrum was under pressure the whole time
2. When England got the ball from a scrum, the scrumhalf almost everytime, kicked it back to the boks, or Farrel...
3. When passing, it never got further than 13.
England's problem isn't at wing, and you guys should start at the front and work your way back, not the other way around... Your backline won't be able to do anything if your forwards can't give them good front foot ball.