After some time, a few thought to consider :
- let's not focus on specific game moments (even though, I still think there should have been a video call)
- the main problem is definitely the way the rucks were reffed. 12 penalties in the whole game (6 on each side) is very very low. For me, it's not in line with the 2023 rule on rucks. The new rule is designed to limit any attempt to slow down rucks. No hands or knees on the ground, no attempt to take the ball if not a real chance to get it. That means no hands just to slow down. That's the way it is since the new rule. We've seen it and… surprise, that's the way the same ref made the call during France Uruguay! 31 (!) penalties (16 for us) with close attention on the rucks.
So to people who say he is coherent…
When you look at the stats, as I mentioned earlier, it's not possible to beat 43 defenders like France did (and SA missing 30% of tackles) without the opposite team slowing down the game to defend. The ONLY other game with such stats in the WC is… New Zealand Namibia!
I think Ben O'Keefe reffed the rucks like they were reffed in the last world cup. If it was the case, there would nothing to say but it's definitely not in line with the new rule on rucks. And it's definitely not coherent with what he did during France Uruguay.
In the end, this is what put us in great difficulty.
Finally, to people who say we complain/whine, whatever. Remember what Erasmus did after they lost to us last year (and other games too). He flooded the net with vids on how SA was cheated with long explanations, pointing arrows and stuff. The way he implied all week before the game that they were going to lose because of bad calls, that french players were simulators, etc… it was disgraceful, especially before the game. We fans, complains, but french staff has been very respectful of officials before and after.