JohnKA
Bench Player
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2014
- Messages
- 674
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Il quote you again after the game.100%
Il quote you again after the game.100%
First on set piece, one side or the other might get a slight advantage but no team is going destroy the other. Mainly because it's a RWC final and no team gets that far against the teams they've played against and make it that far with a shoddy set piece. Remember how the ABs played an extra lock at 6 and we're going to total our scrum. Well that master plan worked brilliantly.
Point is both teams are known canny operators. Probably hoping for a scrum penalty or two and the odd stolen lineout but it's not Andrew Sheridan single handedly destroying the Ozzie scrum ala 2007.
If it was a South African who said that, then that person would have been berated. But no because its The springboks who chose the sensible option it must surely show how weak their mentality is right?
I just watched that Sam Underhill Story insert. I have never in my life seen a pair of shoulders like that guy has holy ****.
Sorry wasn't clear seperate thing's. The extra lock was supposed to cause us massive problems at the lineout (England spent years experimenting with a 3rd lock we can you tell how shite a plan it was). But people also said their front row would beat us off the park (also didn't happen).But to play a lock at flank, doesn't do much to the scrum as a set piece. I never got that reasoning ever. The flanker's role in the scrum is minimal, and only gets involved when the push starts, or when he has to break off and defend.
I fully expect a major forward at some point to be flat on his back with an expression of what just hit me as he gets up. The man's tackling technique is scary as hell and takes all momentum of the opposite player.I just watched that Sam Underhill Story insert. I have never in my life seen a pair of shoulders like that guy has holy ****.
I fully expect a major forward at some point to be flat on his back with an expression of what just hit me as he gets up. The man's tackling technique is scary as hell and takes all momentum of the opposite player.
It's a pity Rassie didn't include Marco van Staden in the WC group, would've been a monumental battle between these 2 players.I fully expect a major forward at some point to be flat on his back with an expression of what just hit me as he gets up. The man's tackling technique is scary as hell and takes all momentum of the opposite player.
Sorry wasn't clear seperate thing's. The extra lock was supposed to cause us massive problems at the lineout (England spent years experimenting with a 3rd lock we can you tell how shite a plan it was). But people also said their front row would beat us off the park (also didn't happen).
I think there will a huge battle in the set piece. But I don't think it will be won there it'll be a phony war with neither team getting the decisive blow from it. Unless theirs a maul try....but I think both teams are too good at maul defence.
So where I think the game will be won/lost
1) The breakdown will SA provide enough support to stop Cunderhilltoje? SA will have seen what happened to NZ if anything it will cause them to tighten up more. Have England fixed their demons especially in regards to support runners?
2) England attack V SA defence. SA have one the best defences in world and this tournament England have one the best attacks. Can SA smother it enough or will England make decisive breaks. The Ford/Farrell axis is proven to breakdown most defensives but this won't be a given by stretch especially if Youngs is his usual glacial self. English fans take a second to imagine if faf was English. The other side is clinicalness whilst I expect England's attack to create them opportunities they need finish them off or at least get 3 points. England ventured into ABs 22 plenty of times in the first half against NZ but only came away with points once. That absolutely needs to change because I really don't expect SA to give as many chances as the ABs did.
Anyone who thinks Youngs is 'glacial' needs to rewatch the build up to England's try last week.
Also have a look at how Youngs takes the ball off the back of the maul dynamically compared to Heinz who waits for it to drop and then is forced to kick against his strength.
I just read an interesting stat:
Maro Itoje is the leader in the WC with steals at the breakdown, with 10.
South Africa's leading player in that department has won 5. Guess who it is without googling it?
Wow. A dislike for an opinion. Jy is n doos John.
Flo ?
LMGA!! Kalmeer man, hy mag jou 'n afduim gee as hy nie saamstem nie, dit beteken nie rerig so veel nie.