N
neh
Guest
not a complete one it was well thought up game but it did look like absolute shite apart from the ground and stadium sortaOriginally posted by bippy@Dec 22 2004, 12:46 AM
i dont think nrl needs a complete overhaul.
not a complete one it was well thought up game but it did look like absolute shite apart from the ground and stadium sortaOriginally posted by bippy@Dec 22 2004, 12:46 AM
i dont think nrl needs a complete overhaul.
No offence Mario, and I don't mean to sound unapreciative here, but I personally would rather not hear anything from you or other people from Sidhe if all your going to tell us every time you come to these boards that "there is still no confirmation of a sequel to Rugby League"... It's just that alot of us actually really liked the first game and were hoping a sequel would have been in the works throughout this whole year, so having you come on these boards every month and saying "sorry, but we still haven't done jack!" is a tad irritating... to be perfectly honest it would be better to hear nothing at all!Originally posted by Mario+Dec 21 2004, 04:02 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mario @ Dec 21 2004, 04:02 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-umosayWe haven't announced anything regarding a sequel to Rugby League, but I am hoping to have some positive news in January (which I will of course post here).@Dec 21 2004, 03:44 PM
As for SJRL2 i think they have started work on it some way shape or form, i think Mario said they have tweaked the engine this year so a sequel would have much better visuals. Have to wait and see i suppose
On the subject of our technology, we have multiple games in development and have advanced our engine considerably since the release of Rugby League. These improvements would of course translate across to a possible Rugby League sequel and raise the visual quality (amongst other things). [/b]
The budget for 2005 is in the millions, a lot more than 2004. Rugby 2005 probably started development at the end of 2003, which will give it about 16 months in development. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by umosay+Dec 21 2004, 07:43 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (umosay @ Dec 21 2004, 07:43 PM)</div>Originally posted by ak47@Dec 21 2004, 08:03 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--JJ-my point was u need more than 365 days prep to make a decent rugby game, history proves this@Dec 21 2004, 03:25 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE ("ak47")It doesn't seem rushed as in the time period, as Cricket 2004 came out late last year and Rugby 2005 has presumably been in development since then, which is a pretty long time.It seems just as rushed as 2004, and to be more negative, its still made by the same idiots!!!
From what we've read so far Rugby 2005 has the basic stuff done right. Lot's of modes and nice graphics (assuming that they don't dick the Fifa graphic engine around). It's the complex stuff that might trip Rugby 2005 up: The gameplay. That's what we need reviews/videos/locksley and eventually a demo for.
WCR2 has no info, I look forward to it anyway. I look forward to any rugby game.
I'm still hoping for a Sidhe union game, I enjoyed SJRL more than the union games and I like union a lot better than league.
Rugby 2004 was a year in development (obviously not enuff, how **** was it)
Rugby 2005 is presumably a year in development (as above, seems too similiar)
they are twin sisters and handicapped at that
Rugby 2005 has had the same attention and life span of development as Rugby 2004...........only thing publicly known as being different is the FIFA stuff,
As for the new NRL - that should not come out till 2007..........more than years prep is needed here aswell
The only game i have ever known to get a complete overhaul facelift within a 365 days period and succeed is when Tiger Woods went from 2003, to 2004.
Rugby 2004 needs a complete overhaul
NRL needs a complete overhaul (still good for it 1st ever game)
Unless HB studio has 10 times the employees and 200% times the budget as the year 2004, this projects look doom and gloom, unless a good amount of time is spent ie more than 365 days development
The foundations need to be re-written, unlike PES4 and Madden where they only need 365 days to notch up a few options and tweaks, coz the 2002 foundations are already in place.
Maybe if Rugby 2004 had the FIFA engine, then this 2005 would be alot better.
That debacle of 2004 set them back 1 full years in the franchise. [/b]
To be honest, I only ever really post to respond to either direct questions or statements which have been uncofirmed in order to stop incorrect rumours starting.Originally posted by sanzar@Dec 22 2004, 08:17 AM
No offence Mario, and I don't mean to sound unapreciative here, but I personally would rather not hear anything from you or other people from Sidhe if all your going to tell us every time you come to these boards that "there is still no confirmation of a sequel to Rugby League"... It's just that alot of us actually really liked the first game and were hoping a sequel would have been in the works throughout this whole year, so having you come on these boards every month and saying "sorry, but we still haven't done jack!" is a tad irritating... to be perfectly honest it would be better to hear nothing at all!
If the rumours are true, the budget for Rugby 2005 is MUCH bigger this time. That has to be good news.Originally posted by ak47+Dec 21 2004, 01:28 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ak47 @ Dec 21 2004, 01:28 PM)</div>Originally posted by Muse_Cubed@Dec 20 2004, 12:35 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-sarries fanI am with u Muse@Dec 19 2004, 10:32 PM
i hope this news dus cum quite early as im realy lookin 4ward 2 this game![]()
I remain sceptical until proven wrong.
Bring on WCR2
Rugby 2005 can come out in 2006 for all i care
Atleast maybe thats how long they need to make a decent game
It seems just as rushed as 2004, and to be more negative, its still made by the same idiots!!!
I dont care what new resources they have
If u aint got the brains, no money in the world can save u from humiliation
my point being the grubber kick in goal, and u score but its a 22m kick
and when u missed a goal it was not play on if it fell short
just a few idiotic made up rules pulled from the land of the maple leaf[/b]
I don't know, and I disagree entirely about WCR2. I mean, I can actually play WCR, but Rugby 2004? Not so much.Originally posted by Rothrich@Dec 26 2004, 08:20 AM
If the rumours are true, the budget for Rugby 2005 is MUCH bigger this time. That has to be good news.
I'm sorry, but WCR2 doesn't excite me at all - the first game was so far removed from a decent rugby game that I doubt the sequel will be able to take the necessary steps foward. Maybe WCR3?
Eventhough we go on about Rugby League 2 too much & its probably starting to annoy you, Its gotta sound positive that so many intrested in the next game. This proves how well the first game really was!Originally posted by Mario@Dec 22 2004, 03:56 PM
To be honest, I only ever really post to respond to either direct questions or statements which have been uncofirmed in order to stop incorrect rumours starting.
I wouldn't be saying there was no news every month if people didn't ask me whether there was any news every month![]()
That being said, I can understand your frustration, and will endeavour to deliver any news as soon as it becomes available while simultaneously trying to avoid an "Are we there yet? Not yet, my little Smurfs" situation.
Not yet, but this month should shed some light on it for all of you! I'll keep you up to date as soon as I have the info/screens/movies etc for you!Originally posted by Wally@Jan 2 2005, 11:24 PM
Any news on Rugby 2005 yet locks?