• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

RBS 6 Nations - France vs Ireland (11-02-2012, 20:00)

No problem 10 year old, guess if my grammar was that bad i'd still be in school.

:lol:

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2Z4m4lnjxkY?version=3&feature=player_detailpage"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2Z4m4lnjxkY?version=3&feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>
 
I hope your not all seriously questioning my punctuation and grammar what are you all little kids in school grow up if i wanted to add grammar i would but its a bit of fun im actually a laywer in london so i think if i wanted to i could. Also Amiga 500 dont be jealous of our wonderful language and our wonderful rugby team jealousy is a really ugly trait.
I'm sorry you took it the wrong way, but I meant it'd a lot easier to understand your messages if you added some punctuation, especially for us foreigners.

Keeney is better then Meddard the same way O'Gara is better then Carter... You'd have to be 1 eyed and Irish to believe it.
Tbf, I'd say Kearney is a better fullback than Médard the same way than Lewis Moody is a better openside flanker than James Haskell.
Maybe it's not the best example, but what I mean is that I think Médard is a much better player than Kearney, but he is definitely not his best at fullback. Just like Cédric Heymans at his time, he's an excellent winger, and a good attacking fullback when joining the attacking line. Also, has a good boot, but that doesn't really make him a fullback.
 
Last edited:
jesus i just realised your a moderator didnt realise they allowed 10 year olds to apply for that position.
You can't be a lawyer...I was under the impression that lawyers were intelligent enough folk to not resort to sheer idiocy and frankly pathetic attempts at slagging.
 
You can't be a lawyer...I was under the impression that lawyers were intelligent enough folk to not resort to sheer idiocy and frankly pathetic attempts at slagging.
I'm sorry to inform you that your impression is mistaken. There are some pretty damn stupid lawyers.
 
You can't be a lawyer...I was under the impression that lawyers were intelligent enough folk to not resort to sheer idiocy and frankly pathetic attempts at slagging.

So basically your saying a lawyer cant have a laugh very bad sterotyping there.
 
As Ze Frenchy has said Kearney is a better fullback than Medard. Kearney is one of, if not the best in the air, has a big boot, reads the game well, sound defensively and a strong runner i.e. a top-rate fullback.

Also Teh Mite you can't really talk about being "biased".
 
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

That is the only response required.

I'm so hurt<_<. You have no ground to stand on on this matter I'm not saying I do but it's ironic you call me biased.
 
OK, who keeps letting the Irish kids on the forum?

You really think he has no bias at all not even towards Northampton? I love the whole kids thing makes the other person seem incredibly immature and you superior, genius.
 
This game can't come quickly enough so we can actually talk about it
 
Sorry about that just the positioning and all that. The kid thing is true though however everyone does it.
It's all good, perhaps should have quoted the post I was referring to.
Anyway, looking forward to this game. Certainly possible for Ireland to win, but I can't help but feel the match is France's. Rougerie and Malzieu could do the same thing as North and Roberts did last week and I still don't see how the Irish backs could stop it. McFadden to 12 and someone with decent defence at 13 would have been a better option.
 
Top