Why do you need a aggressive tackler at 10 though?
I don't understand it why do you need a dominant tackling 10?
Is cips a dominant tackler?
He tackles just isn't a good tackler.
RE Tigers nah, Tigers made the realisation that maybe an good forwards coach will produce a good performance from the forwards which in turn gives the 10 a easier job.
Or do you seriously think that all a teams problems can be placed on 1 player? Esp since Tigers went 7 wins in a row with George Ford at 10.....
People mention Sarries defence like it's god like with Faz being a big reason, but have you seen them with Barritt not there?
Dominant tackler BTW.
The whole problem clearly stems further than Ford, my point is simply that on the back foot he is not good and he concedes a lot of ground which when you are already struggling compounds the issue, maybe I incorrectly used the term "dominant" which seems to be what you are picking most of your counter argument on, would be nice to have a 10 that accepts he is going to have to make a tackle and initiates it on his terms rather than keeps back peddling for as long as possible conceding a lot of ground, is that really too much to ask?
If we are now comparing cips to Ford in my view cips is better in almost every aspect of the game...