FlukeArtist's being a wee bit agressive, but the general point he's making is unfortunately true. You look at England - it's the Hapes, Vainikolos and Fluteys who get all the attention and not the Catts, Stevens and Hartleys. And very little is said about Mehrtens, Pocock etc. compared to what is said about the All Blacks and their so-called poaching of Islanders (which in the most part seems to be no different to England picking black or Asian players for our own teams, guys who've been born and brought up here...).
I wouldn't go so far as to call it racism, merely ignorant stereotyping. And whether Muliaina & Toeava are 'black' or not (a term with a plethora of meanings anyway), they are still visibly different to a white guy in a far more obvious way than, say, Adam Thompson and Richie McCaw look different from one another.
Anyway this is all off topic because people on this board really ought to have got their heads out of the sand and appreciated by now that it's not just England and France that have experienced heavy immigration in the past 50 odd years. The argument here stems from the NZRFU feeling let down by their Irish counterparts (rightly or wrongly); it's not an attack on Irish rugby in general, since I think we can all accept that it is France (salary cap 2x that of the Prem) that are at the forefront of new 'globalised' rugby.