As for Lancaster looking for centres to play in Joseph's style, I'd guess not, as once Tuilagi's back he's got to be included somehow (when he's on form, anyway) and Jonathon and Manu are... different.
Manu 12 JJ 13 #problemsolved
As for Lancaster looking for centres to play in Joseph's style, I'd guess not, as once Tuilagi's back he's got to be included somehow (when he's on form, anyway) and Jonathon and Manu are... different.
Manu 12 JJ 13 #problemsolved
Mauger coaching Tigers might be a very good thing for England if it means that Manu moves to 12.
I can't see them moving him from 13 at club level. I just don't see him as our 12 for the future these days. With all our upcoming players coming through someone like slade or hill or someone.
They have until the next World Cup to cement a 12 shirt.
But I have a feeling in 4 years time we will still be discussing that 12 shirt!
Manu @ 12 is becoming a very realistic thing now for Tigers.
Started with Cohen saying a option was Manu playing 12 if Tait stayed with Tait @ 13.
Then Allen retiring and so haven't replaced him.
There is a gap @12 and Mauger was the 10 with Manu @12 V SA where he played brilliant rugby Mauger was also pretty much our backs coach then.
Tigs, thinking along the lines of Nonu's development from a pretty one-dimensional crashball, do you think Manu will ever get a kicking game?
Have a word with him, will you?Doubt it.
He has a wallop but I don't think he has anything but that accuracy technique wise.
Mauger might be able to have a look though.
Have a word with him, will you?
I've always thought of the 12 channel as a bit stifling, even for big runners- I can imagine Tuilagi making more ground than Barritt or Burrell, but he's always seemed most effective to me when he gets the half break and offloads, or full break before an offload or pass, which happens far less at 12. Not sure we'd get the best out of him there, although from the current crop it's tempting...
(oops, look, over 100 posts. Thanks guys, it's been magic)
Manu running off Ford or Youngs who have kept the defence fixed and with JJ outside to keep them worried, I feel he could be effective. Other crashball options fail because they are so predictable. Roberts for Wales is a prime example, he telegraphs that he intends to smash the gain line and with nobody else really attacking it, it is relatively easy to double tackle him. Youngs, Ford, Manu and JJ all pose running threats to an unprepared defence and none could be ignored. Previously our main tactic to break the gain line was to ship it to Manu because 9, 10 and 12 were all incapable of causing defences problems. Given that extra uncertainty, Manu could potentially open up defences well.
Prefer him at 13 running those under's lines off 10. Look at the havoc he caused against NZ from there?
To be honest though I prefer strike runners at 13 ball players at 12... But that's only worthwhile if you have strike runners in the back three.
So in the back three, Rokoduguni and May would work.Prefer him at 13 running those under's lines off 10. Look at the havoc he caused against NZ from there?
To be honest though I prefer strike runners at 13 ball players at 12... But that's only worthwhile if you have strike runners in the back three.
So in the back three, Rokoduguni and May would work.
I'd rather Roko and Nowell . Jack has a great habit of popping up in midfield a lot . Maybe to do with that he's played 13 and 15 aswell ?